MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAO7bV+gEBOB5Me-R7ynLxdmhXBKxLrWHksQ=DvrYiOJYO4gS1A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <563CBDA4.5080308@selpahi.de>
 <4E514785-A922-4D75-B34A-EFB3880C5712@gmail.com>
 <566701E3.4060408@lojban.org>
 <CAFoHDTdJJ91vCARqh6MrUHxsLLefKrHDB0AoJLYDpLJy_zFSCA@mail.gmail.com>
 <566CD949.7010504@lojban.org>
 <CAO7bV+jYdV-zeTmgiZkcQAT22K+r+NVLk2cPaOd8bZeW5tEpZw@mail.gmail.com>
 <5671E710.2020407@lojban.org>
 <CAO1AUJPWZM92od5z5UPbs9-cfQmdPjckQBsVMV+KkpQiWdwC8g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAO7bV+igohKpZgMb5bOaCpKW3zOKU2LRVeXyH2f9sNnqcC8tVA@mail.gmail.com>
 <56C37E88.4030000@lojban.org>
 <CAO1AUJOF=f=L2ue81mx9mxVTQzTW59aObfHjZnYrH1y_7DXpDQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAO7bV+gEBOB5Me-R7ynLxdmhXBKxLrWHksQ=DvrYiOJYO4gS1A@mail.gmail.com>
From: guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 04:41:06 +0000
Message-ID: <CAO1AUJPbHVqaOHvG3+5S=HVqizAxQfgVqk=KwjFNHELhpsPbkw@mail.gmail.com>
To: llg-members@lojban.org
X-Spam_score: -2.0
X-Spam_score_int: -19
X-Spam_bar: --
Subject: Re: [Llg-members] International lojban community issues (was Re:
 2015 Annual Meeting)
X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: <llg-members.lojban.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/options/llg-members>,
 <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/private/llg-members/>
List-Post: <mailto:llg-members@lojban.org>
List-Help: <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members>,
 <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org

2016-02-17 8:40 GMT+00:00 Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>:
>
> I think it should be discussed too then. But Lojbanists create new cmavo and

li'o

Those are only two examples of many topics that may be missed by
Lojbanists outside those communities. I don't follow all the topics
appearing in those communities. I'm not a spokesperson of those
communities.

I once recommended Sidas, a Japanese-speaking Lojbanist, posting a
message about his idea to BPFK-list, and he kindly did it. However, I
don't dare to let you know their ideas instead of them, because I
could miss any important points in their ideas. If necessary, they
should tell you by their own words, not through my interpretation.


2016-02-17 23:52 GMT+00:00 Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>:
> On 2/17/2016 3:28 AM, guskant wrote:
>>
>> (I think it is the key feature of cultural neutrality of Lojban that
>> most expressions that are grammatically forced in natural languages
>> are optional in Lojban. It is worth mentioning in the next version of
>> CLL as a culturally neutral structure of Lojban.)
>
>
> I think in fact that the optional usage is PRIMARILY what JCB meant by
> "culturally neutral".
>
> As for the other things you wrote, I would probably first try to use some
> form of metalinguistic form (SEI/SEhU) to mark role-wording, as a first
> approach, adding cmavo only if they provided a significant increase in
> clarity.  Otherwise, I need to think about things a lot more than I am
> capable of right now (health reasons).
>
>
> lojbab
>

I see. I don't intend to hasten you. I hope you will be in better
conditions soon!


mi'e la guskant

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members