Received: from localhost ([::1]:59523 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1atFYe-0007kA-Ct; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 07:26:16 -0700 Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com ([209.85.217.182]:35553) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1atFYX-0007jI-Cf for llg-members@lojban.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 07:26:13 -0700 Received: by mail-lb0-f182.google.com with SMTP id os9so27964214lbb.2 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 07:26:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=KOCPa5Ol3TewupZVHYlSQFH0yydoHnxuk3mAax9KaEg=; b=rzAQLP6E/JEDOGSxINDbTPucRA28OKwF8yxlp56hg3TZiNtWvBJVOlyd+VCUtdymAg wuj7PTE4kAK9jdIkhGdh5sS/Qgz/ZHqivDAkqC3xIA1YEOor+RpC/PnOPHseJbEd5VNN 43D1kxQERFroyz9kizcXg9H9t036Wj+d2XIES5blz6TCLBRPcP8OGsVkH3jSyRc/NQoU DQgWbtSP3R8ZXqZ/aUMmvTac/M1FsIXG0bsgxsPIg3gOY6tXi5BIkM7DaQwOo+Yd15ih 8hwmRNeedLIJGTupPCIHASqpDzDyHJqUi5fQzg9/7JZD2MsBlVuGJnfDT/v8VvbnCo1e X8Ng== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=KOCPa5Ol3TewupZVHYlSQFH0yydoHnxuk3mAax9KaEg=; b=RdIJ3fW3MwLNUc54ZnoPnA0lmCCQsvSMdbML3JJXQ9GomNHmMHQ2caRtslFFaxEW8b yCdN8ZOP7hakiFuw4WGM880464PknZFqfV/EOP/V5KZ9d+ORFxWyUCg38ea+JLH5BhqD lhOAPltxwrpRei5dl8e2UYbkzmoSA+Xv6VE23kx4lyaV4jcYCpH3whrAAgCslhOhcol6 qP+JRfpItVml3D4hBnbxkAlzFfbjwEw0mE/SV1jJJjLazlS3rApA7yhbliZZMolGGAF/ ry75Gf02R4+cT9SlzSwEQxD6pc0fpfZoqD0KwCdhT/T1FzPLAzKGn0jiBdJwhaZcklmc kSTw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVdjs39mV0kTHCe7KHnTlia/satoWszngMt1qBCt1+Phzm5mcULSCbF98w5gj1p+vGg9euX2GREGFtPkg== X-Received: by 10.112.220.6 with SMTP id ps6mr2434827lbc.16.1461248762264; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 07:26:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.144.229 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 07:25:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <571271C9.7050002@lojban.org> <1533522.sVHHld6LrL@caracal> <0748C06D-7DE6-4F31-BB71-58215BF60729@gmail.com> <5718BD2E.1040003@selpahi.de> From: Gleki Arxokuna Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:25:22 +0300 Message-ID: To: llg-members@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.0 X-Spam_score_int: -9 X-Spam_bar: - Subject: Re: [Llg-members] Annual meeting: NB-Website_Jurisdiction X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7701897469187388811==" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org --===============7701897469187388811== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134c6ec67417f0530ff7d5b --001a1134c6ec67417f0530ff7d5b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 2016-04-21 14:48 GMT+03:00 Gleki Arxokuna : > > > 2016-04-21 14:44 GMT+03:00 selpahi : > >> On 21.04.2016 06:04, Curtis Franks wrote: >> >>> Consequently, I retract my motion. >>> >> >> Good, because it was going way overboard. Installing a *police* to >> "execute" laws on a wiki of a volunteer-driven community? Also, I *highly* >> doubt Robin is in the least bit interested in doing anything even remotely >> related to what you suggested. >> >> If everyone is in favor of putting certain pages under LLG's control then >> that should be easy to do, and should not require a crazy set of rules of >> the kind suggested. >> >> If everyone is in favor of gleki no longer having access to certain >> twitter accounts or parts of lojban.org's server, those things can be >> put to the vote, and gleki has indicated that he will obey the decision of >> the membership. >> >> But please, let's keep things practical. >> > > Partially relevant to this. I'm a bit concerned that no one but me has > been adding new members to the wiki. > People make requests but no one seems to be seeing them. > > I hope la mukti will reply and add read-only access to > thelogicallanguagegroup@gmail.com to more people so that they get > notifications for each new account request pending. > So please discuss and decide who will be accepting new member into the wiki, blocking them, renaming their accounts on request. I highly doubt Robin can agree to quickly do such things again as he used to do. By the way, I just accepted one more member into the wiki. It'd be extremely strange to stop people from entering the wiki. Blocking any activity of users will certainly mean that the language is forced to die. I don't care who manages the wiki. I would be happy if someone else but me started doing so. But someone must. > > >> >> ~~~mi'e la selpa'i >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Llg-members mailing list >> Llg-members@lojban.org >> http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members >> > > --001a1134c6ec67417f0530ff7d5b Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


2016-04-21 14:48 GMT+03:00 Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@g= mail.com>:


2016-04-21 14:44 GMT+03:00 selpahi <selpahi@selpahi.de>:
On 21.04.2016 06:04, Curtis F= ranks wrote:
Consequently, I retract my motion.

 Good, because it was going way overboard. Installing a *police* to "ex= ecute" laws on a wiki of a volunteer-driven community? Also, I *highly= * doubt Robin is in the least bit interested in doing anything even remotel= y related to what you suggested.

If everyone is in favor of putting certain pages under LLG's control th= en that should be easy to do, and should not require a crazy set of rules o= f the kind suggested.

If everyone is in favor of gleki no longer having access to certain twitter= accounts or parts of lojban.org's server, those things can be put to the v= ote, and gleki has indicated that he will obey the decision of the membersh= ip.

But please, let's keep things practical.

Partially relevant to this. I'm a bit concerned that no on= e but me has been adding new members to the wiki.
People make req= uests but no one seems to be seeing them.

I hope l= a mukti will reply and add read-only access to thelogicallanguagegroup@gmail.co= m to more people so that they get notifications for each new account re= quest pending.


=
So please discuss =C2=A0and decide who will be accepting new mem= ber into the wiki, blocking them, renaming their accounts on request.
=

I highly doubt Robin can agree to quickly do such thing= s again as he used to do.

By the way, I just a= ccepted one more member into the wiki. It'd be extremely strange to sto= p people from entering the wiki.
Blocking any activity of users w= ill certainly mean that the language is forced to die.

=
I don't care who manages the wiki.

I woul= d be happy if someone else but me started doing so.
But someone m= ust.



=C2=A0

~~~mi'e la selpa'i



_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@loj= ban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-membe= rs


--001a1134c6ec67417f0530ff7d5b-- --===============7701897469187388811== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members --===============7701897469187388811==--