Envelope-to: lojban@lojban.org
Delivery-date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 13:32:48 -0700
Auto-Submitted: auto-replied
From: Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon@11bda84a326c>
To: request@digitalkingdom.org
References: <6DC2968D-C799-D9DC-D387-9CD688C8CDC2@digitalkingdom.org>
Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary=1720038758-eximdsn-1312739141
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Message-Id: <E1sP6ec-001t6s-1j@11bda84a326c>
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 13:32:38 -0700
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++)
X-Spam_score: 2.5
X-Spam_score_int: 25
X-Spam_bar: ++
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "c8aa75c1bf21",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
 
 Content preview:  This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
    A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients.
    This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: 
 
 Content analysis details:   (2.5 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was
                             blocked.  See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: digitalkingdom.org]
  0.0 URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
                             dbl.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage
                             of an open resolver. See
                             https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/
                             [URIs: digitalkingdom.org]
 -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
                             valid
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID             Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
  0.5 PDS_BTC_ID             FP reduced Bitcoin ID
  0.0 PDS_BTC_MSGID          Bitcoin ID with T_MSGID_NOFQDN2
  3.0 BITCOIN_DEADLINE       BitCoin with a deadline

--1720038758-eximdsn-1312739141
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:

  comcaresvcs@gmail.com
    (ultimately generated from lojban@lojban.org)
    host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com [74.125.199.26]
    SMTP error from remote mail server after end of data:
    550-5.7.1 [50.250.232.18      18] Gmail has detected that this message is likely
    550-5.7.1 suspicious due to the very low reputation of the sending IP address.
    550-5.7.1 To best protect our users from spam, the message has been blocked.
    550-5.7.1 For more information, go to
    550 5.7.1  https://support.google.com/mail/answer/188131 98e67ed59e1d1-2c91d4137c2si12981669a91.149 - gsmtp
  shunpiker@gmail.com
    (ultimately generated from lojban@lojban.org)
    host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com [74.125.135.26]
    SMTP error from remote mail server after end of data:
    550-5.7.1 [50.250.232.18      18] Gmail has detected that this message is likely
    550-5.7.1 suspicious due to the very low reputation of the sending IP address.
    550-5.7.1 To best protect our users from spam, the message has been blocked.
    550-5.7.1 For more information, go to
    550 5.7.1  https://support.google.com/mail/answer/188131 41be03b00d2f7-72c6e0838b3si13256734a12.543 - gsmtp

--1720038758-eximdsn-1312739141
Content-type: message/delivery-status

Reporting-MTA: dns; 11bda84a326c

Action: failed
Final-Recipient: rfc822;lojban@lojban.org
Status: 5.0.0
Remote-MTA: dns; gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550-5.7.1 [50.250.232.18      18] Gmail has detected that this message is likely
 550-5.7.1 suspicious due to the very low reputation of the sending IP address.
 550-5.7.1 To best protect our users from spam, the message has been blocked.
 550-5.7.1 For more information, go to
 550 5.7.1  https://support.google.com/mail/answer/188131 41be03b00d2f7-72c6e0838b3si13256734a12.543 - gsmtp

Action: failed
Final-Recipient: rfc822;lojban@lojban.org
Status: 5.0.0
Remote-MTA: dns; gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550-5.7.1 [50.250.232.18      18] Gmail has detected that this message is likely
 550-5.7.1 suspicious due to the very low reputation of the sending IP address.
 550-5.7.1 To best protect our users from spam, the message has been blocked.
 550-5.7.1 For more information, go to
 550 5.7.1  https://support.google.com/mail/answer/188131 98e67ed59e1d1-2c91d4137c2si12981669a91.149 - gsmtp

--1720038758-eximdsn-1312739141
Content-type: message/rfc822

Return-path: <request@digitalkingdom.org>
Received: from [192.168.123.254] (port=43746 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org)
	by 11bda84a326c with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.96)
	(envelope-from <request@digitalkingdom.org>)
	id 1sP6eT-001t6f-0K
	for lojban@lojban.org;
	Wed, 03 Jul 2024 13:32:30 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=digitalkingdom.org; s=202111010720; h=To:Message-Id:Subject:Date:
	MIME-Version:From:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:
	Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:
	Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:
	List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
	bh=lJXuy7EYJy54la7d0VY/6dtNNndZ2lLN/gPSGjlaDPk=; b=FvIBHBIsXxcZsiFZu8gyaSs1Y2
	woIvRNDzah2PhZLozjQHWL9ivT8CS8pONtu5qBNT0BNvCZwNOjPeqLY2djxBjJr89bWwmipCTdJ2S
	dXVKUW/DPPVHdegvtOZEaCgDu6qQL7XdODoyzZBE84CE8ZmoGZK2iO0YZ14CDS4ZirW70XyQ25IeE
	h+wEVHJQ123x9llAyWjoENuKsLwacmo/5xeZydlLqZdQbeTURvUmBxl9pAqJPNcGL9W0UiCigCqOh
	YqKsqakBSJI4CTnOredVW+EcymAk0tYxQUWiDsNMFRoGqAOLnATV6U9EpEdQbKK+GwhbsBtTLCawq
	TFRNwRpQ==;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=evolutionlab.org; s=202111010720; h=To:Message-Id:Subject:Date:MIME-Version
	:From:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:
	Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc
	:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:
	List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
	bh=lJXuy7EYJy54la7d0VY/6dtNNndZ2lLN/gPSGjlaDPk=; b=ikq9b4jDKnRuhfmoYyp4bIKsNt
	VViVf2HLbBrVVyoGs4dIypXBYZf5ETgAWEB3nduEud9eaFxg1qRf5Q2PwLMup0tFNVfkSqIacU8FK
	8aK7lHtKhmd1dCEVEXO8M43VmdU5jWhRcBfRjRRvKD2ZOBy6yliJB4XuvC0XwPW1L6AeAdKS8af0D
	ip0FlBxX3KqhX1mJ/FihMG1zGW/INZVSF0J0GuekvErMrl+87LvpR1KGC9K6IC3EVEIqVHims8LP+
	JLoUkb0/3URGz9q2pdrjn85viPdfj/wHz0oLk0BfO6iEm7bxCDIBPhaqxh+tyNkkgE91jkPh3R+W8
	0x/Y/Apg==;
Received: from [179.223.200.143] (port=28316 helo=smtpclient.apple)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96)
	(envelope-from <request@digitalkingdom.org>)
	id 1sP6eL-0067KH-2N
	for request@digitalkingdom.org;
	Wed, 03 Jul 2024 13:32:23 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: <request@digitalkingdom.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 13:15:19 -0400
Subject: I own very sensitive information about your web activities
Message-Id: <6DC2968D-C799-D9DC-D387-9CD688C8CDC2@digitalkingdom.org>
To: <request@digitalkingdom.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (21B74)
X-Spam-Score: 3.0 (+++)
X-Spam_score: 3.0
X-Spam_score_int: 30
X-Spam_bar: +++
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  Greetings!<br> <br> First of all, let me tell you, you are
    one of a kind!<br> It is hard to impress me because I have seen a lot in
   my career as a professional hacker but now I am really impressed. <b [...]
    
 
 Content analysis details:   (3.0 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
                             [score: 0.0000]
 -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI       RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
                             high trust
                             [179.223.200.143 listed in list.dnswl.org]
  1.3 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in
                             bl.spamcop.net
             [Blocked - see <https://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?179.223.200.143>]
  0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The
                             query to Validity was blocked.  See
                             https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243
                              for more information.
                        [179.223.200.143 listed in sa-trusted.bondedsender.org]
  0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The
                             query to Validity was blocked.  See
                             https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243
                              for more information.
                           [179.223.200.143 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com]
  0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
  0.0 SPF_FAIL               SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail)
 [SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom;id=request%40digitalkingdom.org;ip=179.223.200.143;r=stodi.digitalkingdom.org]
  1.6 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06     Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date
  0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L5      RBL: Very bad reputation (-5)
                             [179.223.200.143 listed in bl.mailspike.net]
  0.8 RDNS_NONE              Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
  0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL      Mailspike blocklisted
  0.0 PDS_BTC_ID             FP reduced Bitcoin ID
  0.0 TO_EQ_FM_DIRECT_MX     To == From and direct-to-MX
  0.0 BITCOIN_SPAM_07        BitCoin spam pattern 07
  1.6 BITCOIN_TOEQFM         Bitcoin + To same as From
  2.4 BITCOIN_DEADLINE       BitCoin with a deadline
  0.6 TO_EQ_FM_DOM_SPF_FAIL  To domain == From domain and external SPF
                             failed
  1.6 TO_EQ_FM_SPF_FAIL      To == From and external SPF failed
X-Spam-Score: 3.6 (+++)
X-Spam_score: 3.6
X-Spam_score_int: 36
X-Spam_bar: +++
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "c8aa75c1bf21",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
 
 Content preview:  Greetings!<br> <br> First of all, let me tell you, you are
    one of a kind!<br> It is hard to impress me because I have seen a lot in
   my career as a professional hacker but now I am really impressed. <b [...]
    
 
 Content analysis details:   (3.6 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  1.3 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL  RBL: Relay in Validity RPBL,
                             https://senderscore.org/blocklistlookup/
                           [179.223.200.143 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com]
  0.0 URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
                             dbl.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage
                             of an open resolver. See
                             https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/
                             [URIs: digitalkingdom.org]
  0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L5      RBL: Very bad reputation (-5)
                             [179.223.200.143 listed in bl.mailspike.net]
 -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI       RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
                             high trust
                             [179.223.200.143 listed in list.dnswl.org]
  0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was
                             blocked.  See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: evolutionlab.org]
  1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in
                             bl.spamcop.net
             [Blocked - see <https://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?179.223.200.143>]
 -3.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED RBL: Sender in Validity Certification
                              - Contact certification@validity.com
 [Excessive Number of Queries | <https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243>]
  0.9 SPF_FAIL               SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail)
 [SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom;id=request%40digitalkingdom.org;ip=179.223.200.143;r=c8aa75c1bf21]
  1.1 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06     Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date
  0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
                             valid
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
                             author's domain
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID             Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
                             envelope-from domain
  0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL      Mailspike blacklisted
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED   RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED renamed to
                             RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED, please update
                             local rules
  0.0 RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL        RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL renamed to
                             RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL, please update local
                              rules
  1.3 RDNS_NONE              Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
  0.5 PDS_BTC_ID             FP reduced Bitcoin ID
  2.5 TO_EQ_FM_DIRECT_MX     To == From and direct-to-MX
  3.0 BITCOIN_DEADLINE       BitCoin with a deadline
  0.0 TO_EQ_FM_SPF_FAIL      To == From and external SPF failed
  0.0 TO_EQ_FM_DOM_SPF_FAIL  To domain == From domain and external SPF
                             failed


Greetings!<br>
<br>
First of all, let me tell you, you are one of a kind!<br>
It is hard to impress me because I have seen a lot in my career as a professional hacker but now I am really impressed. <br>
<br>
I will get straight to the point. Listen to me carefully. <br>
<br>
Several months ago, <br>
I was able to hack your operating system and gain full access to all your devices and accounts including messengers, social media profiles, etc. <br>
<br>
I hope, now you begin to get my message. <br>
It goes without saying that I gained access to what you type via keylogger, your internet activity and webcam streaming. <br>
All of this was possible due to your frequent visits to adult websites infected with harmful malware. <br>
In other words, you were under my microscope for many days like some kind of a little bug.<br>
The only difference is that unlike you there is no bug in the world who like to watch pervert porn. <br>
<br>
Yes, you understand it right: I was able to see everything on your screen and record video and audio streams of your camera and microphone. <br>
All of these records are currently securely saved on my storage as well as a backup copy. <br>
<br>
In addition, I also gained access to your confidential information contained in your emails and chat messages.<br>
<br>
Probably you are wondering why your antivirus and spyware defender software allowed me to do all of this? <br>
I am sorry but it's a very stupid question. All antivirus programs turned into useless shit quite a long time ago. <br>
Have you ever heard last years about any "advanced" new technologies in this industry? <br>
Exactly. Nowadays, developers do not give a flying fuck about your security. Therefore, hackers like me took advantage of it. <br>
<br>
The more you know my friend, no need to thank me. <br>
Maybe with this fresh knowledge, you will be more serious about your internet security and never take it for granted anymore. <br> 
<br>
With that out of the way, let's cut to the chase. Using your recordings I made a video compilation, <br>
which shows on the left side the controversial porn scenes of you happily masturbating to, <br>
while on the right side it demonstrates the video you were watching at that moment.. ^.^<br>
<br>
There are only 48 hours left since the moment you receive this email until I send this video to all your email and messenger contacts. <br>
But there is more, guess what? I can also make public all your emails and chat history.<br>
<br>
You are sick fuck in love with freaky adult content but you are not mentally retarted so I would like to believe, you do not want to let this happen. <br>
Right? Only the most stupid man in the world would be happy if his friends, loved ones and colleagues suddenly knew about something like this. <br>
<br>
In other words, there is no way back. It cannot be fixed. However, there is a way forward that both of us can benefit from. <br>
I am a reasonable guy and have no intention to ruin your life for nothing. I'd better like to gain something instead. <br>
<br>
Here is your salvation - transfer the Bitcoin equivalent of 780 USD to my Bitcoin account<br>
(you can google the process in case you don't know how to do that).<br>
<br>
Here is my Bitcoin address: 1FMu71jtWw89URpwk7LCR3iJUrgfJKoAhL<br>
<br>
Once I am notified of receiving it, I will delete all those videos and disappear from your life for good.<br>
As I mentioned, you have only 48 hours to make a transaction after you open this email.<br>
<br>
Believe me, I am always one step ahead so no way in hell you could fool me. <br>
If I discover that you shared this message with others, I will send and publish your videos in no time.<br>
<br>
P.S. It's in your power to make it nice for both of us.


--1720038758-eximdsn-1312739141--