Received: from nobody by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1VCXdj-0006Ul-8j for lojban-newreal@lojban.org; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 09:21:39 -0700 Received: from [75.75.240.138] (port=49815 helo=03e3da04.aithrakelawk.com) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1VCXdY-0006Tv-7S for lojban@lojban.org; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 09:21:38 -0700 Received: by 03e3da04.v2lgdw.aithrakelawk.com (amavisd-new, port 5983) with ESMTP id 03RIVLE3DASXDH04; for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 09:21:27 -0700 Sender: Subject: Find Someone Special in Your Area on eHarmony X-job: 1983 From: "eHarmony.com Partner" To: lojban@lojban.org Message-ID: <19834365262149198323612010502220@v2lgdw.aithrakelawk.com> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 09:21:27 -0700 List-Id: 1983 Content-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=Part.304.2609.1377188487" X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam_score: 1.3 X-Spam_score_int: 13 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: eHarmony - It's Free to Review Your Matches http://www.aithrakelawk.com/1983/120/236/1050/2220.12tt65262149AAF33.php Unsub- http://www.aithrakelawk.com/1983/120/236/1050/2220.12tt65262149AAF18.html [...] Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: eharmony.com] 0.0 HTML_EXTRA_CLOSE BODY: HTML contains far too many close tags 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS ------=Part.304.2609.1377188487 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit eHarmony - It's Free to Review Your Matches http://www.aithrakelawk.com/1983/120/236/1050/2220.12tt65262149AAF33.php Unsub- http://www.aithrakelawk.com/1983/120/236/1050/2220.12tt65262149AAF18.html shown Israeli military and civilian leaders secret Air Force video of an earlier version of the bomb hitting its target, according to diplomats who spoke to the newspaper. In the video, the weapon penetrating the ground within inches of its target, then detonates underground, according to people who have seen the footage.The new and improved MOP, has adjusted fuses to maximize its burrowing power, upgraded guidance systems to improve its precision and high-tech equipment intended to allow it to evade Iranian air defenses in order to reach and destroy the Fordow nuclear enrichment complex, which is buried under a mountain near the Iranian city of Qom. The upgraded MOP designed for Fordow hasn't been dropped from a plane yet.Iran's Fordow Uranium Enrichment Facility, built under a mountain near the city of Qom, has long been seen as a nearly impenetrable target using conventional weapons. In January 2012, U.S. officials said didn't think their largest bomb could penetrate the bunker where centrifuges enrich the material needed for nuclear bombs.According to the website of defense contractor and maker Boeing, the MOP includes a GPS navigation system and more than 5,300 pounds of explosives. It measures 20 feet long and is designed specifically to attack hardened concrete bunkers and tunnel facilities.In March, Pentagon officials are spoke publicly about the MOP bombs, which are from Boeing and designed to fit exclusively with the B-2 and to see more, they want to learn more and maybe theyre not watching for the kind of drama or hair pulling that we see on Jersey Shore, but you know theyre watching for other reasons.Although Duck Dynasty has millions of viewers audiences tend to be fickle which means the shows success may be short lived, Myer said.I think that Duck Dynasty will be here for a little while but I have no doubt that Duck Dynasty will slowly loose ratings, but not necessarily because of the show, because of all of the other networks seeing it and going, Oh my gosh, we have to start doing [this], he said.Myer suggested shows like MTVs now cancelled Buckwild are more attractive to networks.Doing [Buckwild] types of shows, thats whats hot right now. I have no doubt that within a year [Duck Dynasty] will probably drop a little bit. It wont be gone but it definitely wont hit 10 million people an episode. It wont top American Idol, Meyer said.Cascerceri agreed with her fellow expert, Duck Dynasty is going to fizzle out just like any other reality show. The thing about television in general is a lot of times there is a lot of hype, a lot of buzz. You know a few seasons are produced. A lot of people are loving it but eventually everything jumps the shark.Still, she said overall she things reality TV is getting a better reputation among viewers.Reality TV, when it started out, it kind of had a bad name and now its kind of evolved where there is a way it can edu ------=Part.304.2609.1377188487 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

eHarmony - It's Free to Review Your Matches

 eHarmony.com
eHarmony Follow Us on Twitter  Like Us on Facebook  
Find Someone Right For You
Start Now

© 2012 eHarmony, Inc.
eHarmony, Inc., P.O. Box 3640, Santa Monica, CA 90408
Update Preferences









This email was intended for lojban@lojban.org



































In this 2007 file photo the Massive Ordnance Penetrator conventional bomb is off-loaded at White Sands Missile Range, N.M.The Boeing Company/DTRAThe Pentagon's biggest bunker-busting bomb has been upgraded with one task in mind: taking out suspected Iranian nuclear facilities built deep under the mountains of the Islamic Republic's northern region.At 30,000 pounds, the Massive Ordnance Penetrator packs brute force and advanced features meant to enable it to destroy Iran's most fortified nuclear site.The bomb is nearly a third bigger than the MOAB, or so-called "Mother of all Bombs," the 22,000-pound previous generation of bunker busters first built in 2003 but never used outside of tests. Officials are confident the newest bunker-buster can dismantle even the deepest and most fortified nuclear facility.- Senior U.S. official"Hopefully we never have to use it," a senior U.S. official familiar with the development of the new version told The Wall Street Journal. "But if we had to, it would work."The Pentagon redesigned the bomb with more advanced features intended to enable it to penetrate even deeper, giving it the ability to destroy Iran's most heavily fortified and defended nuclear site. U.S. officials see development of the weapon as critical to convincing Israel that the U.S. has the ability to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear bomb if diplomacy fails, and also that Israel's military can't do that on its own.American officials have May 2, 2013: President Barack Obama, left, and Mexicos President Enrique Pena Nieto, right, arrive for a news conference at the Palacio Nacional in Mexico City.APMEXICO CITY President Barack Obama sought on Thursday to tamp down a potential rift with Mexico over a dramatic shift in the cross-border fight against drug trafficking and organized crime, acceding that Mexicans had the right to determine how best to tackle the violence that has plagued their country.Since taking office in December, Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto has moved to end the widespread access that U.S. security agencies have had in Mexico to tackle the violence that affects both sides of the border. It's a departure from the strategy employed by his predecessor, Felipe Calderon, which was praised by the U.S. but reviled by many Mexicans.Obama said the shifting security relationship would not hurt cooperation between the neighboring nations."I agreed to continue our close cooperation on security, even as the nature of that cooperation will evolve," Obama said during a joint news conference at Mexico's grand National Palace. "It is obviously up to the Mexican people to determine their security structures and how it engages with the other nations -- including the United States."Pena Nieto as well downplayed the notion that the new, more centralized arrangement would damage its security partnership with the United States. He said Obama agreed during their private m

------=Part.304.2609.1377188487--