Received: from nobody by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1VORdk-0003X2-3O for lojban-newreal@lojban.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 05:22:52 -0700 Received: from [206.214.71.58] (port=43228 helo=03e3db6e.omelieleastmemel.us) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1VORdX-0003WE-Bo for lojban@lojban.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 05:22:45 -0700 Received: by 03e3db6e.tkamvj7tf.omelieleastmemel.us (amavisd-new, port 8345) with ESMTP id 03VTKCWFE3DBYACPKW6E; for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 05:22:39 -0700 To: lojban@lojban.org Message-ID: <2345436526214923456137248601@tkamvj7tf.omelieleastmemel.us> Subject: Back Taxes weighing you down? From: "Tax Debt Pro" Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 05:22:39 -0700 Content-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=Part.512.5565.1380025359" X-Spam-Score: 4.2 (++++) X-Spam_score: 4.2 X-Spam_score_int: 42 X-Spam_bar: ++++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: We can help you with IRS Tax Debt http://www.omelieleastmemel.us/2345/37/61/248/601.12tt65262149AAF14.php To Unsub- http://www.omelieleastmemel.us/2345/37/61/248/601.12tt65262149AAF7.html [...] Content analysis details: (4.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.7 URIBL_DBL_SPAM Contains an URL listed in the DBL blocklist [URIs: omelieleastmemel.us] 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: omelieleastmemel.us] 1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see ] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_EXTRA_CLOSE BODY: HTML contains far too many close tags 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS ------=Part.512.5565.1380025359 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit We can help you with IRS Tax Debt http://www.omelieleastmemel.us/2345/37/61/248/601.12tt65262149AAF14.php To Unsub- http://www.omelieleastmemel.us/2345/37/61/248/601.12tt65262149AAF7.html Frustrated at being left out of an immigration overhaul, gay rights groups are pushing to adjust a bipartisan Senate bill to include gay couples. But Democrats are treading carefully, wary of adding another divisive issue that could lose Republican support and jeopardize the entire bill.Both parties want the bill to succeed. Merely getting to agreement on the basic framework for the immigration overhaul, which would create a long and costly path to citizenship for the estimated 11 million people in the U.S. illegally, was no small feat for senators. And getting it through a divided Congress is still far from a done deal.Even so, gay rights groups, their lobbyists and grass-roots supporters are insisting the deal shouldn't exclude bi-national, same-sex couples -- about 28,500 of them, according to a 2011 study from the Williams Institute at UCLA Law. They're ramping up a campaign to change the bill to allow gay Americans to sponsor their partners for green cards, the same way straight Americans can. Supporters trekked to the Capitol to make their case at senators' offices on Wednesday."Opponents will be proposing amendments that, if passed, could collapse this very fragile coalition that we've been able to achieve," Sen. John McCain, an Arizona Republican, said last week at the unveiling of the bill. He said the eight senators from both parties who crafted the legislation are committed to voting against changes that could kill it.For Dem isis in Syria."President Obama has said the use of chemical weapons would be a "game-changer" in the U.S. position on intervening in the two-year-old Syrian civil war. Obama said last August that "a red line for us" would be the movement or use of chemical weapons, adding "that would change my calculus."Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., reacting to the reports Thursday, said the "number one" goal should be to "secure the chemical weapons before they fall into the wrong hands.""I think the red line's been crossed and the question is, now what?" Graham said on Fox News.Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., also said in a statement the assessment is "deeply troubling and, if correct, means that President Obama's red line has certainly been crossed."But Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., argued that it is not in the United States' "best interest" to go into Syria. "We cannot be absolutely sure about the extent to which Assad's forces have used chemical weapons, although we know they have them," he said in a statement.Caitlin Hayden, a spokeswoman for the White House National Security Council, said more information is needed."Precisely because the president takes this issue so seriously, we have an obligation to fully investigate any and all evidence of chemical weapons use within Syria," she said in a statement. "That is why we are currently pressing for a comprehensive United Nations investigation that can credibly evaluate the evidence and establish what took plac ------=Part.512.5565.1380025359 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

Owe Back Taxes to the State or IRS?

Unsubscribe
15500 SW Jay St
Beaverton, OR 97006-6018













































U.S. in search of Niko.I do think it is a possibility because what he accomplished while here to set up the abduction was pretty impressive, Evans said of Atteyas alleged forgery on Nikos birth certificate and passport.But Evans said hed also never bet against Kalli, who is now working toward finishing her master's degree in special education now that she can again focus on bettering herself.If there was ever a testament to the power of a mothers love, she embodies that, Evans said. She persevered through some very dark times. She showed a tenacity that not many would have. She really is something special. U.S. President Barack Obama (L) poses alongside former U.S. President George W. Bush, former first lady Laura Bush and first lady Michelle Obama (R) after the Bush's official White House portraits were unveiled during a ceremony in the East Room of the White House in Washington May 31, 2012.ReutersAbout half of American voters have a positive opinion of President Barack Obama -- and about the same number think positively about his predecessor, George W. Bush. Fifty-two percent have a favorable opinion of Obama according to the latest Fox News poll, while 49 percent of voters have a favorable view of Bush.There is a wide partisan gap: Republicans (79 percent) are three times as likely as Democrats (24 percent) to have a positive opinion of Bush. The gap is even wider on Obamas favorable rating: Five times as many Democrats (86 percent) as Republicans (17 percent) like the current occupant of the White House.CLICK TO VIEW THE FOX NEWS POLLThe poll was taken in advance of dedication ceremonies for the George W. Bush Presidential Center, which will be held this Thursday in Dallas. In addition to Presidents Obama and Bush, former presidents Jimmy Carter, George H.W. Bush (the father of George W. Bush) and Bill Clinton are expected to attend.Despite a slight increase in his favorable ratings, the new Fox poll nonetheless finds that George W. Bush fares least well among the former presidents in terms of current popularity. Clinton tops the lis

------=Part.512.5565.1380025359--