Received: from nobody by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.80.1)
(envelope-from )
id 1VQ4Nf-0001RK-NT
for lojban-newreal@lojban.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 16:56:59 -0700
Received: from [91.218.245.73] (port=33742 helo=03e3db8f.hivesorelalces.us)
by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1)
(envelope-from )
id 1VQ4NS-0001QH-2l
for lojban@lojban.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 16:56:58 -0700
Received: by 03e3db8f.c3w78h.hivesorelalces.us
(amavisd-new, port 6378) with ESMTP id 03IELAE3DBNEHA8F;
for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 16:56:41 -0700
Subject: Pay Less per month by switching to Solar
Message-ID: <23784365262149237834215712942717@c3w78h.hivesorelalces.us>
Reply-To:
From: "US SOLAR"
X-job: 2378
List-Id: 2378
To: lojban@lojban.org
Sender:
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 16:56:41 -0700
Content-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=Part.415.9452.1380412601"
X-Spam-Score: 2.6 (++)
X-Spam_score: 2.6
X-Spam_score_int: 26
X-Spam_bar: ++
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Savings Alert: New Incentives Pay you to go solar http://www.hivesorelalces.us/2378/157/342/1294/2717.12tt65262149AAF9.php
Unsub- http://www.hivesorelalces.us/2378/157/342/1294/2717.12tt65262149AAF10.html
[...]
Content analysis details: (2.6 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
for more information.
[URIs: lojban.org]
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.3 URI_HEX URI: URI hostname has long hexadecimal sequence
0.0 HTML_EXTRA_CLOSE BODY: HTML contains far too many close tags
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
------=Part.415.9452.1380412601
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Savings Alert: New Incentives Pay you to go solar
http://www.hivesorelalces.us/2378/157/342/1294/2717.12tt65262149AAF9.php
Unsub- http://www.hivesorelalces.us/2378/157/342/1294/2717.12tt65262149AAF10.html
d sign legislation making a path to citizenship
contingent on first securing the border, as negotiators in the Senate are
doing. But he suggested Obama was supportive of the Senate plan."What they
are looking at and what has been talked about in the Gang
of Eight proposal is 100 percent consistent with what the president is
doing so we feel very good about it," Pfeiffer said. "And they
are looking at it in the right way."Obama has stressed that a
path to citizenship should not have major hurdles in front of it,
and some immigration advocates believe that's what a requirement for a secure
border would amount to. Obama's Homeland Security secretary, Janet Napolitano,
has rejected the argument that border security must be achieved before a
comprehensive immigration package or any pathway to legalized status can
be done.But Republicans involved in the Senate negotiations have made clear
that border security is a must for them before those living here
illegally can be allowed to move toward citizenship."We are going to secure
that border and it will be tied to a pathway to citizenship
or there will be no deal," Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., another negotiator
on the bill, said Sunday.Graham also suggested that disagreement over a
new low-skilled worker program could still be hanging up an overall immigration
deal -- even after an agreement a week ago between the AFL-CIO
and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.The hard-won deal between labor and busi
omatic spending cuts that are otherwise poised
to take effect over the next 10 years.Counting reductions and higher taxes
that Congress and Obama have approved since 2011, the 2014 budget would
contribute to a total $4.3 trillion in total deficit reduction by 2023.The
key deficit reduction elements of the plan incorporate an offer Obama made
to Boehner in December as both men sought to avert an impending
"fiscal cliff" of automatic, across the board spending cut and broad tax
increases.Obama's plan has two central features -- $580 billion in new taxes
that Republicans oppose and a new inflation formula, rejected by many liberals,
that would reduce the annual cost of living adjustments for a broad
swath of government programs, including Social Security and benefits for
veterans.In his address, Obama said he would achieve deficit reduction by
making "tough reforms" to Medicare and by enacting "commonsense tax reform
that includes closing wasteful tax loopholes for the wealthy and well-connected."Obama,
however, made no mention of the effect his budget would have on
Social Security and on other social safety net programs, a key feature
of his proposal and one that drew hostile reaction from some of
his most ardent political backers.Obama rejected a House Republican budget
that aims to balance the budget in 10 years with steep cuts
in domestic spending. His remarks reflected the White House's argument that
Obama's blend of tax increases and
------=Part.415.9452.1380412601
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Savings Alert: New Incentives Pay you to go solar

This email was intended for lojban@lojban.org
FILE: April 4, 2013: President Obama waves after his arrival at Buckley
Air Force Base, Colo.APA senior White House adviser on Sunday defended President
Obamas forthcoming budget by saying it wont be like the House Republican
proposal a rehash of the Romney plan that Americans have already
rejected.The American people rejected it, Obama adviser Dan Pfeiffer said
on Fox News Sunday. And (Republicans) shouldnt be doubling down on it.The
president is scheduled to release a budget Wednesday that is expected to
include a mix of tax increases and cuts to such entitlements as
Social Security and Medicare.You can do both, Pfeiffer said. Thats what
youll see.Pfeiffer also told ABCs This Week that Obama will not enact
a Romney economic plan, which he said was essentially drastic cuts to
entitlement programs with tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans.What we
wont do is cut our way to prosperity, he said.On Saturday, the
president said his budget was not his ideal plan, but it was
a compromise that he would be willing to accept.House Speaker John Boehner
said last week said the Obama budget blueprint holds reforms hostage to
tax increases.
an, a founder of the anti-nuclear
Plowshares Movement.In Latin America, the Jesuit emphasis on helping the
poorest peoples often drew the society into political upheaval, including
the cause of liberation theology, a Latin American-inspired view that Jesus'
teachings imbue followers with a duty to fight for social and economic
justice. U.S. Jesuit James Carney was killed in 1983 serving as chaplain
to a rebel column from Honduras.Pope John Paul II, hoping to re-direct
the religious order, took the extraordinary step in 1981 of replacing the
Jesuit's chosen leader with his own representative. The society encompasses
a range of outlooks, including tradition-minded men. Still, conservative
Catholics often view Jesuits as a band of disloyal liberals. The day
after Francis was elected, George Weigel, a John Paul biographer, wrote
in the conservative National Review magazine that the pope "just might take
in hand the reform of the Jesuits" that Weigel argued was never
finished. (Smolich rejects any suggestion that the order isn't faithful
to the church or its teachings.)It's too early to say how these
past conflicts could influence Francis and his relationships with the society.
He had disavowed liberation theology as a misguided strain of Catholic tenets,
while still maintaining a focus on the economic failings of Western-style
capitalism and the need to close the divide between rich and poor.Jesuits
also worry that the religious order coul
------=Part.415.9452.1380412601--