Received: from nobody by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Xa5Ni-0003L5-Gu for lojban-newreal@lojban.org; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 09:06:58 -0700 Received: from dlapiper.nariblek.com ([94.155.114.151]:47882) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Xa5Nc-0003JA-MM for lojban@lojban.org; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 09:06:57 -0700 Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 09:06:37 -0700 From: Reduce Home Payment To: Message-ID: <0048ec5af7059b369b0de24e20e739e88937458963@dlapiper.nariblek.com> Subject: Your adjusted payment (Housing) Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_bar: -
 
Your 2014 HARP 2.0Eligibility Verification--
Announced by Obama (Q4 2014)
Hello Lojban

Verifying your eligibility you could reduce your payment significantly.

Your exact monthly savings can be seen: (1 minute check)
http://www.nariblek.com/hunchback/paranoiac/nictitates/viabilities/sundae.php

Obama's | HARP 2.0
Current Low Rate: 2.99% Fixed

 

Note: Our records indicate that you have not checked your eligibility in 2014.

 

Regards,
U.S. Housing
Loan Officer






 

 

 

 


 
2014 USA Home Packer Associates
       

26 Jennifer Lynne Drive
knoxville, MD

To ensure that you receive emails from us, please add this address to your address book.


You have received this email because you registered an account at Textbroker. To discontinue receiving our newsletter, please click on the following link: unsub1.

This is more of a design question - since IEnumerator

already encapsulates all the necessary information (.Current, .MoveNext()) about something that can be enumerated, then what's the point of introducing a type (IEnumerable) whose sole purpose is to return an instance of the former? To be specific: Why can't foreach be designed to iterate directly through an IEnumerator, like so: // foreach (var e in anEnumerator) { //... } while (anEnumerator.MoveNext()) { doSomething(anEnumerator.Current); } Why can't Linq be built based directly off of IEnumerator?FYI: platform string is important because it helps identifying HW model for programming purpose. Below is my guess: iPhone 6 (GSM): iPhone7,1 iPhone 6 (Global): iPhone7,2 iPhone 6 Plus (GSM): iPhone7,3 iPhone 6 Plus (Global): iPhone7,4