Received: from localhost ([::1]:50717 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YD5iA-0001b6-IE; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 22:21:18 -0800 Received: from mail-yk0-f171.google.com ([209.85.160.171]:35939) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YD5i3-0001ap-Ka for llg-members@lojban.org; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 22:21:17 -0800 Received: by mail-yk0-f171.google.com with SMTP id 10so731149ykt.2 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 22:21:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=cIPeYSoZ6fejSRGLrwILT5ChEXVpj6a+EBn+wYF2qWU=; b=ZFfAPEJUWpBKZfj7MWzlw5315UkoAVOiCG0DYehhLvJ3GI9lJewfwcaILAMYfW5Lw7 LkH2tyr4B4z4IX65jnL8d6EdaJhiFaTui2PTRIEZjJMv/zAbdQeC9U43x4arRXDTriyk GuH+grxzlO7foTBaMVc6qbE1p3rGuwGKSQXamdG6/MR+W3cUaQayXgJdN3fPCgKK9fC4 mren/kmlrprGhkxMpkeddHdXJFXLMtzB2XQ9GHHdQemO3J9VeXNYhgXMLz1ryujJBtLL pn6DDw0Vk4Az2HrWH/E513ViGLg7mJD5u3kLUlygjomiURjXRkqh4f+Kf1MM8FpnHGNd eitQ== X-Received: by 10.236.209.228 with SMTP id s64mr17565310yho.181.1421648465023; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 22:21:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <0CD5A578A47549238B8B046A01B8846C@gmail.com> From: Craig Daniel Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 06:21:04 +0000 Message-ID: To: llg-members@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.9 X-Spam_score_int: 9 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Jbovlaste does not, in any way, require action by the LLG membership. But I support the people with the needed access doing this. On Mon Jan 19 2015 at 12:50:35 AM Alex Burka wrote: [...] Content analysis details: (0.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: lojban.org] 2.7 DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL RBL: Envelope sender listed in dnsbl.ahbl.org [listed in gmail.com.rhsbl.ahbl.org. IN] [A] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.160.171 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (craigbdaniel[at]gmail.com) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid Subject: Re: [Llg-members] nu ningau so'u se jbovlaste / updating a few jbovlaste entries X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6312588036005427369==" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org --===============6312588036005427369== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c1a242c0da60050cfb5317 --001a11c1a242c0da60050cfb5317 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Jbovlaste does not, in any way, require action by the LLG membership. But I support the people with the needed access doing this. On Mon Jan 19 2015 at 12:50:35 AM Alex Burka wrote: > coi > > .i la'ede'e jalge tu'a lo se .irci nunpe'i be ca lo cabdei (.i ta'o ba'a > la gleki ba mrilu lo cusku'i vreji ca da) > .i mi na rova'e co birti lo du'u lo catni kamnyselti'i* cu sarcu .iku'i > ja'aku mi kamnyti'i* lo nu ma'a zanru lo cnino velcki be zo zabna .e zo > mabla va'o la jbovlaste > .i lo cnino velcki xa'o nenri la jbovlaste (to la .xorxes. pu setca toi) > gi'e pu se zanru bypyfyky .iku'i ri'agi lo laldo velcki cu panoki'o roi se > cmicu'a gi lo cnino cu nonselji'u lo samselse'u be fi la'o .kib. DICT .kib. > be'o .e lo mucti sisku tutci .e ro lo so'i vlaste samtci poi pilno lo > jbovlaste terpruce .i ja'o sa'u mi stidi lo nu renoki'o roi cmicu'a lo re > cnino velcki > .i pei ma kaidji lo ka kamnyselti'i sarji remoi > > [translated] > This came out of the IRC meeting today (I think la gleki is going to post > a full cleaned-up transcript at some point.) > I'm not totally sure an official motion is required. But anyway, I move > that we approve the new definitions of {zabna} and {mabla} in jbovlaste. > The new definitions are already there (entered by la xorxes), and they've > received the BPFK's approval, but the old definitions have 10000 votes, so > you can't see the new ones when using DICT clients, the online query > interface, or one of the many dictionary tools that work from jbovlaste > exports. So I simply propose to give the new definitions 20000 upvotes. Can > I get a second? > > - mu'o mi'e la durkavore > > * ca'e lo ka za'e *kamnyti'i* (to zoi gy. *make a motion* .gy.) zo'u: > fabu catni stidi febu noi za'e *kamnyselti'i* ku'o fibu noi kamni > > _______________________________________________ > Llg-members mailing list > Llg-members@lojban.org > http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members > --001a11c1a242c0da60050cfb5317 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jbovlaste does not, in any way, require action by the LLG membership.
But I support the people with the needed access doing this.

On Mon Jan 19 2015 at 12:50:35 AM Alex Burka <durka42@gmail.com> wrote:
coi

.i la'ede'e jalge= tu'a lo se .irci nunpe'i be ca lo cabdei (.i ta'o ba'a la = gleki ba mrilu lo cusku'i vreji ca da)
.i mi na rova'e co= birti lo du'u lo catni kamnyselti'i* cu sarcu .iku'i ja'ak= u mi kamnyti'i* lo nu ma'a zanru lo cnino velcki be zo zabna .e zo = mabla va'o la jbovlaste
.i lo cnino velcki xa'o nenri la = jbovlaste (to la .xorxes. pu setca toi) gi'e pu se zanru bypyfyky .iku&= #39;i ri'agi lo laldo velcki cu panoki'o roi se cmicu'a gi lo c= nino cu nonselji'u lo samselse'u be fi la'o .kib. DICT .kib. be= 'o .e lo mucti sisku tutci .e ro lo so'i vlaste samtci poi pilno lo= jbovlaste terpruce .i ja'o sa'u mi stidi lo nu renoki'o roi cm= icu'a lo re cnino velcki
.i pei ma kaidji lo ka kamnyselti= 9;i sarji remoi

[translated]
This came out of the IRC meeting today (I think la glek= i is going to post a full cleaned-up transcript at some point.)
I'm not totally sure an official motion is r= equired. But anyway, I move that we approve the new definitions of {zabna} = and {mabla} in jbovlaste.
The new definitions are already there (= entered by la xorxes), and they've received the BPFK's approval, bu= t the old definitions have 10000 votes, so you can't see the new ones w= hen using DICT clients, the online query interface, or one of the many dict= ionary tools that work from jbovlaste exports. So I simply propose to give = the new definitions 20000 upvotes. Can I get a second?

=
- mu'o mi'e la durkavore

* ca'e l= o ka za'e=C2=A0kamnyti'i=C2=A0(to zoi gy. make a=C2=A0mot= ion .gy.) zo'u: fabu catni stidi febu noi za'e=C2=A0kamnysel= ti'i=C2=A0ku'o fibu noi kamni

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@loj= ban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members
--001a11c1a242c0da60050cfb5317-- --===============6312588036005427369== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members --===============6312588036005427369==--