Received: from localhost ([::1]:57147 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YDhZd-0007QM-EQ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 14:47:01 -0800 Received: from earth.ccil.org ([192.190.237.11]:46577) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YDhZW-0007QD-QZ for llg-members@lojban.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 14:46:58 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=www.ccil.org ident=www-data) by earth.ccil.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1YDhZT-0005M9-O8 for llg-members@lojban.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 17:46:52 -0500 Received: from 171.159.192.10 (SquirrelMail authenticated user cowan) by www.ccil.org with HTTP; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 17:46:51 -0500 Message-ID: <7fc6ca23f1c5cde9ad4aabe72c248ea9.squirrel@www.ccil.org> In-Reply-To: References: <0CD5A578A47549238B8B046A01B8846C@gmail.com> <54BCF147.1080803@lojban.org> <54BCFC70.2010805@selpahi.de> <54BE62C4.3070807@lojban.org> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 17:46:51 -0500 From: cowan@ccil.org To: llg-members@lojban.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Scanned-By: ClamAV 0.98.1 on earth.ccil.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 17:46:52 -0500 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.2 X-Spam_score_int: 2 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: And Rosta scripsit: > I make only the obvious and essentially incontrovertible claim that the > authors of the formal grammars knew something about formal grammars; What they knew was procedural: *how* to write a formal grammar. That's not the same as knowing *about* formal grammars. Neither JCB, lojbab, or me knows much *about* formal grammars. [...] Content analysis details: (0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.7 DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL RBL: Envelope sender listed in dnsbl.ahbl.org [listed in ccil.org.rhsbl.ahbl.org. IN] [A] 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: ccil.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Subject: Re: [Llg-members] nu ningau so'u se jbovlaste / updating a few jbovlaste entries X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org And Rosta scripsit: > I make only the obvious and essentially incontrovertible claim that the > authors of the formal grammars knew something about formal grammars; What they knew was procedural: *how* to write a formal grammar. That's not the same as knowing *about* formal grammars. Neither JCB, lojbab, or me knows much *about* formal grammars. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org When I wrote it I was more than a little febrile with foodpoisoning from an antique carrot that I foolishly ate out of an illjudged faith in the benignancy of vegetables. --And Rosta _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members