Received: from localhost ([::1]:58043 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YLXYF-0003a7-NL; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 05:41:59 -0800 Received: from mail-wg0-f46.google.com ([74.125.82.46]:43940) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YLXYD-0003Zt-GA for llg-members@lojban.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 05:41:58 -0800 Received: by mail-wg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id a1so3527218wgh.5 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 05:41:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=Q/malT+HCtPY2AJwaTapFpE8buA8wuhCWWo2Tsk29PY=; b=iZ1znYjjTkquf7foHdOwdce//qsfsOi+EAl38m9u1r69/ukzzqVQ2CapzVnoO7GayT 0SQz1MnD7TsIEg0oNPQlp4an2gvrhREfjIVLDUUUPG+OpdW/SOcKiDh28Ejqq8zI0Stw 89X6HbYEZxIhHlGJ3laFzs3rW3Qtq1JHb+mCg2mTv1Ve2hhYPaHglgf3YbCGbwEmpcLu fQsSrudaOpjJ5dgyfy0jJYlG2ve2f9a+kIxpI8kl6t/l+7rwHdqIvoWpOQemCzWy5fls J9fxs6GjWgxy9MtN9lcnxJ+0PS8Mq8sBHIFn98YnNRDIssAfDrpbA/HqVJARr/VtXYOI t7jg== X-Received: by 10.180.198.44 with SMTP id iz12mr3017081wic.36.1423662109572; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 05:41:49 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.86.200 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 05:41:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5A14A249-2461-4CA7-8CBA-4E27840BB4F3@gmail.com> References: <54D471BB.2070605@lojban.org> <54D66BA8.5040607@lojban.org> <08041A2E-FC72-4E80-AAB4-468A1A3C4DB4@gmail.com> <54DA533B.2090803@lojban.org> <5A14A249-2461-4CA7-8CBA-4E27840BB4F3@gmail.com> From: Gleki Arxokuna Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 16:41:29 +0300 Message-ID: To: llg-members@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.7 X-Spam_score_int: 7 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: 2015-02-11 16:01 GMT+03:00 Riley Martinez-Lynch : > I agree that there is a sense that BPFK may have members, but that the > extent of membership is unclear. I also agree this is problematic from a > procedural perspective, as selpahi describes, and because of the powers > delegated to BPFK, as described by lojbab. > [...] Content analysis details: (0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.7 DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL RBL: Envelope sender listed in dnsbl.ahbl.org [listed in gmail.com.rhsbl.ahbl.org. IN] [A] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [74.125.82.46 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gleki.is.my.name[at]gmail.com) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders Subject: Re: [Llg-members] Motion: BPFK Reauthorization (amendment) X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7972798924494624885==" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org --===============7972798924494624885== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b624dfe524346050ed02aa1 --047d7b624dfe524346050ed02aa1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 2015-02-11 16:01 GMT+03:00 Riley Martinez-Lynch : > I agree that there is a sense that BPFK may have members, but that the > extent of membership is unclear. I also agree this is problematic from a > procedural perspective, as selpahi describes, and because of the powers > delegated to BPFK, as described by lojbab. > I suggest that *all current members continue to be members. *In future any member can resign. *In future any person in the world can become an observer which means their voices don't count although they have the right to comment. *In future any member or observer can be removed from bpfk-list mailing list by majority of votes but it's recommended to do so if the person is a spammer or send posts not relevant to Lojban. *new members are accepted by majority of votes by assessing their fluency in Lojban as the main requirement. After Lojban Expertise Test is ready new members are instead accepted via that test. --047d7b624dfe524346050ed02aa1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= 2015-02-11 16:01 GMT+03:00 Riley Martinez-Lynch <shunpiker@gmail.com= >:
I agree that there is a sense that BP= FK may have members, but that the extent of membership is unclear. I also a= gree this is problematic from a procedural perspective, as selpahi describe= s, and because of the powers delegated to BPFK, as described by lojbab.


I = suggest that
*all current members continue = to be members.
*In future any member can re= sign.
*In future any person in the world ca= n become an observer which means their voices don't count although they= have the right to comment.
*In future = any member or observer can be removed from bpfk-list mailing list by majori= ty of votes but it's recommended to do so if the person is a spammer or= send posts not relevant to Lojban.
*new me= mbers are accepted by majority of votes by assessing their fluency in Lojba= n as the main requirement. After Lojban Expertise Test is ready new members= are instead accepted via that test.
--047d7b624dfe524346050ed02aa1-- --===============7972798924494624885== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members --===============7972798924494624885==--