Received: from localhost ([::1]:55902 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YO6th-0007jW-LJ; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 07:50:45 -0800 Received: from static.217.217.251.148.clients.your-server.de ([148.251.217.217]:58427 helo=cracksucht.de) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YO6tZ-0007jB-VF for llg-members@lojban.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 07:50:43 -0800 Message-ID: <54E4B4C7.9040701@selpahi.de> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:50:31 +0100 From: selpahi To: llg-members@lojban.org References: <5A14A249-2461-4CA7-8CBA-4E27840BB4F3@gmail.com> <54E4B13E.5090904@lojban.org> In-Reply-To: <54E4B13E.5090904@lojban.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - Subject: Re: [Llg-members] Fwd: Motion: BPFK Reauthorization (amendment) X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org la .lojbab. cu cusku di'e > The revision needs a second, and then if there is no > discussion/objection within a day or so of the second, I can take your > comment as calling the question. Then I hereby second the motion in its current form as found in Riley's most recent email. mi'e la selpa'i mu'o _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members