Received: from localhost ([::1]:44892 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YWIZk-0003SW-1D; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 22:56:00 -0700 Received: from mail-we0-f179.google.com ([74.125.82.179]:44575) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YWIZd-0003SN-60 for llg-members@lojban.org; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 22:55:58 -0700 Received: by wesp10 with SMTP id p10so20966951wes.11 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 22:55:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=ghtvIxpTCw4VhRBLIq0K+vfNor9jvuoW1R42J6o/Nio=; b=KgtO5U41pZvYqGbzVH9g+ryvbdN+ZJ4VuDxSJfo4E1tfioKEX6LK0uLnumuL8hw/0n VKJL7CLNurJvyFUTRNlb66cNmg7fwHId0SZpymJfcLy7Mx1x2W2WifVxcOUHrimeWgFB YTlmd5Y7wgSfF532KENXEHohIhw01q4FIevDe801j9mo3Vs5RjBUD/EK0uQG0MKOLDzE fdKcLi45xTU5OGMVrqUHU4KLGq/IspkPTpDEf/PgFdeh22N+pks8nrR5oHkoEb/1y+mw AGOpShGNqGXIvSPg4JUXgypXB2yfrCo4MuRISuPAggp9xo/ohRP/bqaD7tVp4iXFdUps JbYA== X-Received: by 10.180.84.133 with SMTP id z5mr93850809wiy.25.1426226146227; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 22:55:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.240.197 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 22:55:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <550227B2.1030304@lojban.org> From: Gleki Arxokuna Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 08:55:25 +0300 Message-ID: To: llg-members@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_bar: -- Subject: Re: [Llg-members] Old Business: Riley's motion X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5096761657816320816==" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org --===============5096761657816320816== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04428b9cd0bc0005112526a2 --f46d04428b9cd0bc0005112526a2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I second too. 2015-03-13 6:48 GMT+03:00 Craig Daniel : > I second. > > - Craig Daniel > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:56 PM Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - > LLG wrote: > >> I did not notice any other Old Business being raised in reviewing the >> last couple weeks of traffic, but Riley reminded me that he had posted >> this. If I missed anything raised by someone else, please speak up again. >> >> I will take the following to be moved. >> >> As for other old business, if presiding officer recognizes it as such, >> >> I would like to ask the membership to approve or amend this >> presentation >> >> of the bylaws, which includes a number of amendments which were passed >> >> at the 2003 Annual Meeting, but which -- as far as I can tell -- were >> >> never integrated into the public text: >> >> >> >> http://www.lojban.org/tiki/Bylaws+of+The+Logical+ >> Language+Group%2C+Inc.+%282014%29 >> >> > Language+Group,+Inc.+%282014%29> >> >> >> >> >> >> As much as possible, I used the text of the minutes of the 2003 Annual >> >> Meeting (http://www.lojban.org/tiki/LLG+2003+Annual+Meeting+Minutes) >> to >> >> reconstruct the necessary changes. I also sought clarification on the >> >> mriste (https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/lojban/7IS0b62FKhE >> >> ), and >> >> lojbab responded on several points. The changes to the bylaws, relative >> >> to the previously published version, are recorded in footnotes 12-16. >> >> >> >> To be clear: I am not seeking any new changes in the bylaws. I just >> want >> >> to confirm that this is an accurate reflection of the amendments which >> >> were passed in 2003, and that this version can be therefore considered >> >> to reflect the actual bylaws of the organization. >> >> >> >> --Riley Martinez-Lynch >> >> If someone will second this, then I will allow 3 days for an objection >> or discussion, after which the motion will be considered adopted without >> objection. >> >> If no other old business has been raised by then, I will consider Old >> Business to be closed. >> >> lojbab >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Llg-members mailing list >> Llg-members@lojban.org >> http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members >> > > _______________________________________________ > Llg-members mailing list > Llg-members@lojban.org > http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members > > --f46d04428b9cd0bc0005112526a2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I second too.

2015-03-13 6:48 GMT+03:00 Craig Daniel <craigbdani= el@gmail.com>:
I second.

=C2=A0= - Craig Daniel
<= br>
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:56 PM Bob LeChevali= er, President and Founder - LLG <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote:
I did not notice any other Old Business being raised in reviewing t= he
last couple weeks of traffic, but Riley reminded me that he had posted
this.=C2=A0 If I missed anything raised by someone else, please speak up ag= ain.

I will take the following to be moved.
>> As for other old business, if presiding officer recognizes it as s= uch,
>> I would like to ask the membership to approve or amend this presen= tation
>> of the bylaws, which includes a number of amendments which were pa= ssed
>> at the 2003 Annual Meeting, but which -- as far as I can tell -- w= ere
>> never integrated into the public text:
>>
>>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0http://ww= w.lojban.org/tiki/Bylaws+of+The+Logical+Language+Group%2C+Inc= .+%282014%29
>>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<http://= www.lojban.org/tiki/Bylaws+of+The+Logical+Language+Group,+Inc= .+%282014%29>
>>
>>
>> As much as possible, I used the text of the minutes of the 2003 An= nual
>> Meeting (http://www.lojban.org/tiki/LLG+2003+= Annual+Meeting+Minutes) to
>> reconstruct the necessary changes. I also sought clarification on = the
>> mriste (https://groups.google.com/forum/#!top= ic/lojban/7IS0b62FKhE
>> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21top= ic/lojban/7IS0b62FKhE>), and
>> lojbab responded on several points. The changes to the bylaws, rel= ative
>> to the previously published version, are recorded in footnotes 12-= 16.
>>
>> To be clear: I am not seeking any new changes in the bylaws. I jus= t want
>> to confirm that this is an accurate reflection of the amendments w= hich
>> were passed in 2003, and that this version can be therefore consid= ered
>> to reflect the actual bylaws of the organization.
>>
>> --Riley Martinez-Lynch

If someone will second this, then I will allow 3 days for an objection
or discussion, after which the motion will be considered adopted without objection.

If no other old business has been raised by then, I will consider Old
Business to be closed.

lojbab

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@loj= ban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members


--f46d04428b9cd0bc0005112526a2-- --===============5096761657816320816== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members --===============5096761657816320816==--