Received: from localhost ([::1]:58231 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YhtIv-0000Vh-LN; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 22:22:33 -0700 Received: from eastrmfepo203.cox.net ([68.230.241.218]:50435) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YhtIr-0000VQ-Ij for llg-members@lojban.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 22:22:31 -0700 Received: from eastrmimpo109 ([68.230.241.222]) by eastrmfepo203.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.15 201-2260-151-145-20131218) with ESMTP id <20150414052223.MGUJ9245.eastrmfepo203.cox.net@eastrmimpo109> for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 01:22:23 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.102] ([72.209.242.63]) by eastrmimpo109 with cox id FhNN1q00A1Nn1eG01hNNxm; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 01:22:22 -0400 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020203.552CA40E.017E,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=EpUMW1gA c=1 sm=1 a=sOxKrxY1QYXBcFVBIkZEyQ==:17 a=JJ1bDv3c7YsA:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=8YJikuA2AAAA:8 a=90N4iOsieuFmHIeiVnIA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=sOxKrxY1QYXBcFVBIkZEyQ==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Message-ID: <552CA43A.5010302@lojban.org> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 01:23:06 -0400 From: "Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG" Organization: The Logical Language Group, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: llg-members@lojban.org References: <55284939.4090807@lojban.org> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - Subject: Re: [Llg-members] Detailed Proposal of a Project Manager X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org On 4/10/2015 6:18 PM, Craig Daniel wrote: > This proposal doesn't appear to have anybody looking to second it in > this form at this time. In the interest of getting other stuff done so > we can wrap up the meeting, I move to table it. Since it hasn't been seconded, I don't think it needs a motion to table. It just dies for the present. Most likely the Board will take the proposal up for consideration. Given the lack of continuing discussion, as well as a lack of a second, I will consider the motion dead. lojbab _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members