Received: from localhost ([::1]:57857 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1a9XbK-0006gc-Fu; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 04:24:06 -0800 Received: from eastrmfepo103.cox.net ([68.230.241.215]:39737) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1a9XbB-0006gL-M9 for llg-members@lojban.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 04:24:03 -0800 Received: from eastrmimpo305 ([68.230.241.237]) by eastrmfepo103.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.15 201-2260-151-145-20131218) with ESMTP id <20151217122351.TUTL30397.eastrmfepo103.cox.net@eastrmimpo305> for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 07:23:51 -0500 Received: from [192.168.0.102] ([72.209.242.25]) by eastrmimpo305 with cox id ucPr1r0010ZbUo801cPrCR; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 07:23:51 -0500 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020201.5672A957.01D2,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=KuOTLxqN c=1 sm=1 a=wUnt6a9YVw6vJyLyWfj5jg==:17 a=8YJikuA2AAAA:8 a=Hy3ddY9BBza5cDZ796gA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=wUnt6a9YVw6vJyLyWfj5jg==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none To: llg-members@lojban.org References: From: Bob LeChevalier Message-ID: <5672A957.8080905@lojban.org> Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 07:23:51 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - Subject: Re: [Llg-members] A proposal regarding LLG meetings X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org On 12/17/2015 6:24 AM, Gleki Arxokuna wrote: > It's somewhat strange that recent LLG meetings end the next year after > they start. E.g. 2014-s meeting ended in 2015. > > I think it'd be better to start these meetings earlier, e.g. in July so > that they never end the next year. I would have done so, except that the last meeting ended, I think, in March. And then I had to get the Directors meeting moving to get officers (you may recall that went rather slowly also). I have little doubt that someone more focused would run the meetings at least twice as fast as I have been managing, But the bottom line is that it is hard to stay focused when the membership is even less focused than I am, and we can go for a week or more of silence before someone says something. lojbab _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members