Received: from localhost ([::1]:34104 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1a9nU9-0006eU-Js; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 21:21:45 -0800 Received: from smtp.hughes.net ([69.168.97.48]:45413) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1a9nU3-0006eJ-6F for llg-members@lojban.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 21:21:43 -0800 X-Authed-Username: cGhtYUBodWdoZXMubmV0 X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=AP42JC7R c=1 sm=0 tr=0 a=5n1d6GSJGnnyfnXdd0Hfiw==:117 a=5n1d6GSJGnnyfnXdd0Hfiw==:17 a=K-v-2zaBAAAA:8 a=8ggJXkvBAAAA:8 a=JNFw9bs7AAAA:8 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=wUQvQvOEmiQA:10 a=72dba3c00gTD5AZ-KAgA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: smtp02.hughes.cmh.synacor.com smtp.mail=phma@leaf.dragonflybsd.org; spf=neutral; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp02.hughes.cmh.synacor.com header.from=phma@leaf.dragonflybsd.org; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp02.hughes.cmh.synacor.com smtp.user=phma; auth=pass (LOGIN) Received-SPF: neutral (smtp02.hughes.cmh.synacor.com: 174.109.123.133 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of leaf.dragonflybsd.org) Received: from [174.109.123.133] ([174.109.123.133:45089] helo=bezitopo.org) by smtp.hughes.net (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.49 r(42060/42061)) with ESMTPSA (cipher=AES256-SHA) id 42/3E-13212-BD793765; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 00:21:32 -0500 Received: from caracal.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bezitopo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C4967B91 for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 00:21:29 -0500 (EST) From: Pierre Abbat To: llg-members@lojban.org Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 00:21:27 -0500 Message-ID: <4792257.kehd9opElC@caracal> User-Agent: KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.13.0-68-generic; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <563CBDA4.5080308@selpahi.de> <5671E710.2020407@lojban.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Subject: Re: [Llg-members] 2015 Annual Meeting X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org On Thursday, December 17, 2015 10:20:55 Gleki Arxokuna wrote: > Instead of that I can suggest > 1. Stop financially supporting useless Logfest meetings. What would make Logfest meetings more useful? Should we have them at Philcon or Penguicon again, or should we bring together Lojbanists from other continents? > I mean a two-way communication. E.g. not just reading logs of the mailing > list of the chat but asking questions and providing answers. > For this I suggest forcing every LLG member to participate in voice or real > time chats on a regular basis like e.g. once every two months for at least > an hour or so. But only if the members are able to communicate in pure > Lojban (for others the requirement is simply not to be applied) I need practice speaking and listening to Lojban, but I have problems with multiperson voice chats. If we're sitting around a table (and even then I have trouble knowing when to start speaking), I can hear where the voice is coming from and see who's speaking. I can't in Skype (if everyone had his camera on, it would overload the bandwidth). Also I lack some vocabulary in Lojban for what I'd like to talk about, which could be my work or what I did that day. Is it okay to discuss in English or French what the word is for something in Lojban, and then discuss something in Lojban? Pierre -- Jews use a lunisolar calendar; Muslims use a solely lunar calendar. _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members