Received: from localhost ([::1]:41241 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1aAOkR-0000U7-S5; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 13:09:03 -0800 Received: from eastrmfepo201.cox.net ([68.230.241.216]:49125) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1aAOkL-0000U1-LZ for llg-members@lojban.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 13:09:02 -0800 Received: from eastrmimpo210 ([68.230.241.225]) by eastrmfepo201.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.15 201-2260-151-145-20131218) with ESMTP id <20151219210851.VUVP18342.eastrmfepo201.cox.net@eastrmimpo210> for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 16:08:51 -0500 Received: from [192.168.0.102] ([72.209.244.98]) by eastrmimpo210 with cox id vZ8r1r0012869s801Z8rim; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 16:08:51 -0500 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020203.5675C763.0076,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=UdOPvtuN c=1 sm=1 a=JFEMeGVUNR3hGa77igez4Q==:17 a=8YJikuA2AAAA:8 a=Wfd60_HPezrlHld4zZAA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=JFEMeGVUNR3hGa77igez4Q==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none References: To: llg-members@lojban.org From: Bob LeChevalier Message-ID: <5675C770.3090709@lojban.org> Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 16:09:04 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - Subject: Re: [Llg-members] A proposal regarding LLG meetings X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org On 12/17/2015 7:23 AM, Bob LeChevalier wrote: > On 12/17/2015 6:24 AM, Gleki Arxokuna wrote: >> It's somewhat strange that recent LLG meetings end the next year after >> they start. E.g. 2014-s meeting ended in 2015. >> >> I think it'd be better to start these meetings earlier, e.g. in July so >> that they never end the next year. > > > I would have done so, except that the last meeting ended, I think, in > March. And then I had to get the Directors meeting moving to get > officers (you may recall that went rather slowly also). Thinking further on this, I suggest that at the end of this meeting, after other new business is finished, that you or someone else make a motion calling for the next meeting to start in [month]. lojbab _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members