MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAFoHDTdYyc=Jxg+HFWuNepz9_BO5vfdjdqy3+XBV-Z3Z=35m7A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <8BCCD0E2-E6D4-4687-9D89-D177E69E1259@gmail.com>
 <56DE1D83.8050901@lojban.org>
 <8EC7FC36-8C8F-43FD-AE6A-C704D1D9C2CE@gmail.com>
 <12678381.nPyR9sEY1K@caracal> <56E0AE11.8020708@lojban.org>
 <56E1F54E.3040501@lojban.org> <56E5FFAF.1030405@selpahi.de>
 <CAFoHDTdYyc=Jxg+HFWuNepz9_BO5vfdjdqy3+XBV-Z3Z=35m7A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 05:33:43 -0400
Message-ID: <CAFoHDTc+uLD74yU_h-ifoCzM4tnzw+vvipvM+PBA+9oOUEZjMA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Curtis Franks <curtis.w.franks@gmail.com>
To: llg-members@lojban.org
X-Spam_score: -2.0
X-Spam_score_int: -19
X-Spam_bar: --
Subject: Re: [Llg-members] 2015 Annual Meeting - Old Business
X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: <llg-members.lojban.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/options/llg-members>,
 <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/private/llg-members/>
List-Post: <mailto:llg-members@lojban.org>
List-Help: <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members>,
 <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8754715478557148980=="
Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org

--===============8754715478557148980==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114325ec39aad2052e638fda

--001a114325ec39aad2052e638fda
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

A downside would be that we could potentially (meaning: very easily) lose
the morphological distinction between experimental cmavo (space) and
official cmavo (space) if we move ahead right now. I would generally keep
proposals in jbovlaste as they are, rather than mapping their semantics to
another word; this is due to etymological and analogizing motivates,
primarily, although aesthetics may have been involved.

I am not sure that this is such a bad loss. There would still definitely be
space reserved for official words and there would be space /associated/
with (but not guaranteeing) experimental words. Official word lists would
list good words, anyway, which should be the primary means of searching for
a word, I think. Additionally, in jbovlaste or the like, there would in
fact be labels which describe the acceptance status of the word (difficult
to discern though they may presently be with a cursory glance). Thus, I
believe that it would be okay. But others may dissent with this opinion.

--001a114325ec39aad2052e638fda
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p dir=3D"ltr">A downside would be that we could potentially (meaning: very=
 easily) lose the morphological distinction between experimental cmavo (spa=
ce) and official cmavo (space) if we move ahead right now. I would generall=
y keep proposals in jbovlaste as they are, rather than mapping their semant=
ics to another word; this is due to etymological and analogizing motivates,=
 primarily, although aesthetics may have been involved.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">I am not sure that this is such a bad loss. There would stil=
l definitely be space reserved for official words and there would be space =
/associated/ with (but not guaranteeing) experimental words. Official word =
lists would list good words, anyway, which should be the primary means of s=
earching for a word, I think. Additionally, in jbovlaste or the like, there=
 would in fact be labels which describe the acceptance status of the word (=
difficult to discern though they may presently be with a cursory glance). T=
hus, I believe that it would be okay. But others may dissent with this opin=
ion.</p>

--001a114325ec39aad2052e638fda--


--===============8754715478557148980==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members

--===============8754715478557148980==--