MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAFoHDTdRufHmmtFtjOFVOg3E48Ec2KKxBGfuQAF=_qJbKESyuA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <8BCCD0E2-E6D4-4687-9D89-D177E69E1259@gmail.com>
 <56DE1D83.8050901@lojban.org> <8EC7FC36-8C8F-43FD-AE6A-C704D1D9C2CE@gmail.com>
 <12678381.nPyR9sEY1K@caracal> <56E0AE11.8020708@lojban.org>
 <56E1F54E.3040501@lojban.org> <56EF1C47.6060900@lojban.org>
 <56F467BF.9060405@lojban.org>
 <CAFoHDTdRufHmmtFtjOFVOg3E48Ec2KKxBGfuQAF=_qJbKESyuA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:42:02 +0300
Message-ID: <CAO7bV+h6_VPmPk0pSheUijhE4jBFMD8B6v9=yxFqzt_oKJvqOQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: llg-members@lojban.org
X-Spam_score: -2.0
X-Spam_score_int: -19
X-Spam_bar: --
Subject: Re: [Llg-members] 2015 Annual Meeting - Old Business
X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: <llg-members.lojban.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/options/llg-members>,
 <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/private/llg-members/>
List-Post: <mailto:llg-members@lojban.org>
List-Help: <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members>,
 <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5153973687214249304=="
Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org

--===============5153973687214249304==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1148f7c8686ef2052edc62d4

--001a1148f7c8686ef2052edc62d4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

2016-03-25 5:13 GMT+03:00 Curtis Franks <curtis.w.franks@gmail.com>:

> > I think that it can be safely understood that the BYFY is charged with
> maintaining CLL as the defining standard for the language as a whole and
> its grammar.
>
> In order for clarity, I hereby move that: Whensoever a BPFK exists,
> whensoever a CLL exists, and whensoever a Lojban language is to have any
> defining standards in whole or in part, then the BPFK is charged with
> maintaining the CLL as the defining standard(s) for the language or any of
> its versions as a whole or in part, including but not limited to its
> grammar. The BPFK is to have the authority necessary for the achieving of
> these goals, as determined and prescribed solely by this body (the LLG).
> This motion is not intended to make assertions as to the merits or
> implementation of the existence or practice of any of these conditions; it
> merely defines one of possibly many roles (for) which any organization
> which is to act as a BPFK will be responsible in fulfilling and conducting
> - as well as the implicit establishment of minimal powers associated with
> its acting in that capacity.
>
> Furthermore, I move that: Under the same conditions, the BPFK is the
> unique organization so charged and endowed with the authority pursuant to
> these goals.
>

I second that.


> _______________________________________________
> Llg-members mailing list
> Llg-members@lojban.org
> http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members
>
>

--001a1148f7c8686ef2052edc62d4
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo=
te">2016-03-25 5:13 GMT+03:00 Curtis Franks <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:curtis.w.franks@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">curtis.w.franks@gma=
il.com</a>&gt;</span>:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin=
:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=3D""><=
p dir=3D"ltr">&gt; I think that it can be safely understood that the BYFY i=
s charged with maintaining CLL as the defining standard for the language as=
 a whole and its grammar.</p>
</span><p dir=3D"ltr">In order for clarity, I hereby move that: Whensoever =
a BPFK exists, whensoever a CLL exists, and whensoever a Lojban language is=
 to have any defining standards in whole or in part, then the BPFK is charg=
ed with maintaining the CLL as the defining standard(s) for the language or=
 any of its versions as a whole or in part, including but not limited to it=
s grammar. The BPFK is to have the authority necessary for the achieving of=
 these goals, as determined and prescribed solely by this body (the LLG). T=
his motion is not intended to make assertions as to the merits or implement=
ation of the existence or practice of any of these conditions; it merely de=
fines one of possibly many roles (for) which any organization which is to a=
ct as a BPFK will be responsible in fulfilling and conducting - as well as =
the implicit establishment of minimal powers associated with its acting in =
that capacity.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">Furthermore, I move that: Under the same conditions, the BPF=
K is the unique organization so charged and endowed with the authority purs=
uant to these goals.</p></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I second that.</di=
v><div><br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8=
ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Llg-members mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:Llg-members@lojban.org">Llg-members@lojban.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members" rel=3D"nore=
ferrer" target=3D"_blank">http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-membe=
rs</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div>

--001a1148f7c8686ef2052edc62d4--


--===============5153973687214249304==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members

--===============5153973687214249304==--