MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAFoHDTe23i_K5oTc4xLTQqSf=0hA2Ai6oRDLtBYMxEoK6osiUA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <571271C9.7050002@lojban.org>
 <CAO1AUJO=sdYpH+-WZQtdKAvZFdFOQPG2SdyCc-CHmr432tNWfg@mail.gmail.com>
 <50A08C82-B160-4ADB-B5D9-D2FBB307C32E@gmail.com>
 <CAO1AUJNSqMAmBKhbcUibPLzWkdYGBVb9u0G9BbxU27nxP2e_Lg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFoHDTe23i_K5oTc4xLTQqSf=0hA2Ai6oRDLtBYMxEoK6osiUA@mail.gmail.com>
From: guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 02:46:00 +0000
Message-ID: <CAO1AUJOHLqiw_DVSbCQZ1rjp3dPwfVkRkXwmDAiVANkGRtr=zQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: llg-members@lojban.org
X-Spam_score: -2.0
X-Spam_score_int: -19
X-Spam_bar: --
Subject: Re: [Llg-members] Annual meeting: New Business, anyone?
X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: <llg-members.lojban.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/options/llg-members>,
 <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/private/llg-members/>
List-Post: <mailto:llg-members@lojban.org>
List-Help: <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members>,
 <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org

2016-04-18 2:28 GMT+00:00 Curtis Franks <curtis.w.franks@gmail.com>:
>
> On Apr 17, 2016 9:55 PM, "guskant" <gusni.kantu@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> My motion and complaints don't mention punishing Gleki for his abuse
>> of administratorship. I only required depriving Gleki of the
>> administratorship and selecting an administrator in a reasonable way.
>
> I view doing that as punishment unless we establish a new office or body
> which is to assume all of such powers and to do so exclusive to anyone else
> having them. In that situation, Gleki would have to be appointed to such
> office or body with clear authority and restrictions in order to exercise
> such powers.
>
> Removing the powers from Gleki personally is a punishment. Removing them
> from all people and vesting them in a regulated office or body open to
> anyone meeting certain requirements is not.

Gleki's current power is not given by the official body, only by Robin
through their personal negotiation out of any official agreement, so
the deprivation cannot be punishment in any interpretation but is only
a part of procedure of putting the official web contents under control
of LLG. There is no way punishing anyone out of range of application of a law.

Under normal procedure to be created by the official body, you
can vote for Gleki as an administrator if you like, though I would
never vote for him.

mi'e la guskant

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members