Received: from localhost ([::1]:54125 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1avLp2-00064i-LE; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 02:31:52 -0700 Received: from mail-lf0-f42.google.com ([209.85.215.42]:34704) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1avLou-00063n-Lr for llg-members@lojban.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 02:31:50 -0700 Received: by mail-lf0-f42.google.com with SMTP id j11so49377730lfb.1 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 02:31:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=UaxJq2+vGGbFJc7p0e4Q3iqWmegBgBvQYPYuARViO94=; b=wX7W/ZcwV/pOQF/XIKp3XfT0RaYl66L+yyU0oW7p71RuTVG8F3DW9MZeT5xDDd0o8M 328do4TArYt55o3LXN4tIonjqMmSGpjfUdBBGE8kl7pYiVWOK28xuWrsI76/GbeCTomK j3z7hyHf8+7WfhlTt0gL7Fyb+S9NgafmjjVyhkQ8kaDFkXo6YJ8tdiOHPyd62eHXxkIq 805WR2yp/T/E2gA7rsE62SpOChsZHFULOOzA/+MkQyJ5cGcWaM4eqv+ibUDdQ8lQESNy xH4Q+cEdwm32OLaqlipxzNwcErM2+dWly5k92LYM/CgA8qQ77VBzwSw/CkMRkO0UEqeq Bk9g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=UaxJq2+vGGbFJc7p0e4Q3iqWmegBgBvQYPYuARViO94=; b=liHrFPbCWvkWDgpDJU8jY9hkBXNs44gWYAacQ6wyCEwXhcvQBNHkdLH5iSDZQ6sE1H RbI8wjYghRL9thZ1cMYCZGqkTATBpkiqee68nV+VWFzwV4mLKoPtBeeUwSpyFc+Uxhpu N0FG6jRAvhCx7QvVF5Oyi4V1N5W3otRiIdOq5huApLR00gl6RRtVNDsluN/2J+w2L7My PDm34QWAc7l42eMjvjMVBRr90CQTwpZK0pNqmHSO/Si5KOgZzGe3/zEhylZ/EftTjkIV MmDf1S3KptdBsxOX8Ls1caGUg3PBLT8qgX+cT19B0rz/hfC2mt6+4WH7AlR6cvZwvcic pjPQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FX6ouQkjrHCFsEs6KTtJWnI3dgUylqG0jePiE5EbOTPLICJsKl6gBT9cyHTGjbapD/F8Fyj9M1PlMa2FA== X-Received: by 10.25.216.138 with SMTP id r10mr764829lfi.111.1461749497565; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 02:31:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.144.229 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 02:30:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <15C48E81-1622-494E-B351-F5EA656D38F7@gmail.com> References: <571EA53F.6040906@lojban.org> <2A767C1B-DA0E-49F5-931C-1F61D5ECDD86@gmail.com> <15C48E81-1622-494E-B351-F5EA656D38F7@gmail.com> From: Gleki Arxokuna Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 12:30:57 +0300 Message-ID: To: llg-members@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_bar: -- Subject: Re: [Llg-members] Community Manager position? X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6869750207810301448==" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org --===============6869750207810301448== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1140ee3a8d9985053174131f --001a1140ee3a8d9985053174131f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 2016-04-26 21:01 GMT+03:00 Karen Stein : > Instead of limiting discussion to a couple of hours at most by IRC why do > we not continue to use this listserv approach and have time limits for > discussion of a week or so? Everyone can contribute within their own > schedule and respond to the comments of others, the discussion will be > completed our someone can move for an extension of necessary. The meetings > will still not drag on and on, but everyone will have an equal opportunity > to sway others. Also, it will be easier for all of us in that we will know > when to expect emails. > Yes, this is needed. We need to give X days for everyone to post a new topic and Y days after opening each topic to be discussed. If we don't fit into that time then it goes off the meeting to return next year. And this can be done both for new business and old business. --001a1140ee3a8d9985053174131f Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= 2016-04-26 21:01 GMT+03:00 Karen Stein <comcaresvcs@gmail.com><= /span>:
Instead of limiting discussion to a couple of hours at most by IRC why d= o we not continue to use this listserv approach and have time limits for di= scussion of a week or so? Everyone can contribute within their own schedule= and respond to the comments of others, the discussion will be completed ou= r someone can move for an extension of necessary. The meetings will still n= ot drag on and on, but everyone will have an equal opportunity to sway othe= rs. Also, it will be easier for all of us in that we will know when to expe= ct emails.

Yes, this is needed.
We need to give X days for everyone to post a new top= ic and Y days after opening each topic to be discussed. If we don't fit= into that time then it goes off the meeting to return next year.
And this can be done both for new business and old b= usiness.
--001a1140ee3a8d9985053174131f-- --===============6869750207810301448== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members --===============6869750207810301448==--