Received: from localhost ([::1]:49955 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1bDBMW-0003Oz-29; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 07:00:08 -0700 Received: from mail-it0-f54.google.com ([209.85.214.54]:35024) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1bDBMN-0003N9-Vo for llg-members@lojban.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 07:00:04 -0700 Received: by mail-it0-f54.google.com with SMTP id z189so107610447itg.0 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 06:59:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=eti+phfrLdrvKrtYBsRKcr/okE9vr2G0ZLzm3ChHH0g=; b=i0uibZJwFy92laQacGjzCX0oXEgazASpZpUAxhFdXHwXc86xjyh+KWlsR/NEhILW7/ oke0Ux5BCYoKjHndUYu4Kj3iEZHfW0CDFh+KthJz1qXAjbTBJ99B0PEPlgm+YYBctnlp PUPP7y/a7lTsOJviThoQLqCr3lNQ9JX6wN61jJQM7p8IN9adPh90wvxIa7QFl8IxSYwr 8a/TGgLejPCsdlI4YBt1u8DgQ+sbwzMaDq7Lef2ezd0/Mb9vgOgPz+z3xvF4eLmb/Owa vSoRJRNBVvp73qxtegFpItL/rqYdm3x0N0nShdguI05LSka3WLSPv7SRoE8vLIsvfAou uVKw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=eti+phfrLdrvKrtYBsRKcr/okE9vr2G0ZLzm3ChHH0g=; b=j5G0+6bF8sj4LnarW1ZD2k+D+/Paqp9Q8fASxFbWyqh6JfSa+l5x+cWtiANWlv4HkN M7AiQ5c0hmDg/ky4Y/rA/jfKuqm3PdotdBCOge/jDhuS3QxAsdrLYnsp96qUiGkBUcgq eZ44gd394Cbaz0NDt/IO2RpdOQjWqWZhYNTMqFmjsUTNPr2ql2+X0bJVSqyfB/yXwjF1 WigwocusBveYY2RdurF4xlO8CsvyD2OP4AWBF4i3wPR+or7PxQz7S47vWgwFYxc414nC zjyExJjXRVTmTbIm7QvA3dY/hkodmjLIX1pOPtYBnUKGMQymd0G+fWzgeWeNrDaKEA/o Mb/g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJl2Zs807mNxSNcHp0dVefMYJnXox2jp34xaVpOLOteHqWcvO2a50lWIYSOR3NgKLsEl8XWpGJ2f0ILCw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.36.123.77 with SMTP id q74mr16493579itc.44.1465999182245; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 06:59:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.79.98.130 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 06:59:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.79.98.130 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 06:59:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <79bd9996-8abd-4304-5384-9f3ce8518eaa@selpahi.de> References: <8d3f617b-433a-326a-b64a-c756882d5160@lojban.org> <1944766.N09pKn7dBo@caracal> <79bd9996-8abd-4304-5384-9f3ce8518eaa@selpahi.de> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 09:59:41 -0400 Message-ID: From: Alex Burka To: llg-members@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_bar: - Subject: Re: [Llg-members] (2015 Annual meeting) X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7495624041378177098==" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org --===============7495624041378177098== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11475b227fb49505355188f9 --001a11475b227fb49505355188f9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I reluctantly second the motion. On Jun 15, 2016 07:51, "selpahi" wrote: > I was previously of the opinion that the meeting should be continued, but > I have changed my mind, mostly because nobody has anything to say (e.g., > nobody is commenting on guskant's proposal(s)), and because I remembered > that the president is elected during the following board meeting, not > during the annual meeting of the membership. We have to think about a > possible successor to lojbab. > > We can pick up where we left off at the next meeting, which hopefully will > be run better and see more participation. Everyone should prepare their > concerns and ideas in advance. This meeting has been going on for way too > long for what little has been decided. > > So, I move to adjourn. If there are no seconds, there better be some > useful contributions coming by everyone who didn't second the motion. > > ~~~mi'e la selpa'i > > _______________________________________________ > Llg-members mailing list > Llg-members@lojban.org > http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members > --001a11475b227fb49505355188f9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I reluctantly second the motion.

On Jun 15, 2016 07:51, "selpahi" <<= a href=3D"mailto:selpahi@selpahi.de">selpahi@selpahi.de> wrote:
I was previously of the = opinion that the meeting should be continued, but I have changed my mind, m= ostly because nobody has anything to say (e.g., nobody is commenting on gus= kant's proposal(s)), and because I remembered that the president is ele= cted during the following board meeting, not during the annual meeting of t= he membership. We have to think about a possible successor to lojbab.

We can pick up where we left off at the next meeting, which hopefully will = be run better and see more participation. Everyone should prepare their con= cerns and ideas in advance. This meeting has been going on for way too long= for what little has been decided.

So, I move to adjourn. If there are no seconds, there better be some useful= contributions coming by everyone who didn't second the motion.

~~~mi'e la selpa'i

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@loj= ban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-membe= rs
--001a11475b227fb49505355188f9-- --===============7495624041378177098== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members --===============7495624041378177098==--