Return-path: <60681-1944-24216-14079-lojban=lojban.org@mail.belivbeliv.shop> Envelope-to: lojban@lojban.org Delivery-date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 07:34:02 -0800 Received: from [37.0.13.152] (port=50106 helo=garden.belivbeliv.shop) by d7893716a6e6 with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <60681-1944-24216-14079-lojban=lojban.org@mail.belivbeliv.shop>) id 1pKLJ7-000syT-74 for lojban@lojban.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 07:34:00 -0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=belivbeliv.shop; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Message-ID; i=DollarGeneralShopperFeedback@belivbeliv.shop; bh=bIkuoWvWqBxjbVSmrQDgo5HCNnQ=; b=weW5/+YXPpfWG8GUekf1z2lk+JG8ftlW+A2L49PJg4qAxECeLzCK1dkgn0Xfjw5anpMRRmJKxsqd ty9qmT5YDCNthJc7GVL9ffBbk3+fD2ENsUVfhSif2QR1EfsuXg0G2QhAGCm2+YQ9PmOWHJjHvZTT UxOLrnyTZEP3YIMvaTY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=belivbeliv.shop; b=qztrp0JWIdDs8T1+5vZNYioTfgCCSD+0OiwhI3DqdWEtZUdyRmnFL3peTtnz1vFW4E2Qpl70bL6n cR/ht4C/OTlVnqx7g/agsDrOcMH5Ol4AnO+qSIJlK0qNj8YL8aEONivwDcquqTWb5epiOF1vraRo ZN0N+elYkRX8WaiAJlc=; Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="c7d8b370dbdcee16496b22706b69bd7e_798_5e98" Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 15:46:10 +0100 From: "Dollar General Shopper Gift Opportunity" Reply-To: "Dollar General Shopper Gift Card Chance" Subject: BONUS: $100 DOLLAR GENERAL Gift Card Opportunity To: Message-ID: X-Spam-Score: 3.6 (+++) X-Spam_score: 3.6 X-Spam_score_int: 36 X-Spam_bar: +++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "f6db9eef8881", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: BONUS: $100 DOLLAR GENERAL Gift Card Opportunity http://belivbeliv.shop/iduv9jnhpWuvqh8R5KAErcmJ4vgAxC_sUxWb9k4vBqMQPs-9 http://belivbeliv.shop/LWe75FTXQ_mUbSNW_838mzQorNeii-sX2T8NoQS2nGmUIMH5 Content analysis details: (3.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5006] 0.0 RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to zen.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an open resolver. See https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/ [37.0.13.152 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, high trust [37.0.13.152 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to dbl.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an open resolver. See https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/ [URIs: belivbeliv.shop] 0.0 URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to zen.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an open resolver. See https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/ [URIs: belivbeliv.shop] 1.7 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist [URIs: belivbeliv.shop] 2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL [37.0.13.152 listed in psbl.surriel.com] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 1.9 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50% [cf: 100] 0.9 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/) 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS --c7d8b370dbdcee16496b22706b69bd7e_798_5e98 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit BONUS: $100 DOLLAR GENERAL Gift Card Opportunity http://belivbeliv.shop/iduv9jnhpWuvqh8R5KAErcmJ4vgAxC_sUxWb9k4vBqMQPs-9 http://belivbeliv.shop/LWe75FTXQ_mUbSNW_838mzQorNeii-sX2T8NoQS2nGmUIMH5 ast-iron beam bridges were used widely by the early railways, such as the Water Street Bridge in 1830 at the Manchester terminus of the Liverpool and Manchester Railway, but problems with its use became all too apparent when a new bridge carrying the Chester and Holyhead Railway across the River Dee in Chester collapsed killing five people in May 1847, less than a year after it was opened. The Dee bridge disaster was caused by excessive loading at the centre of the beam by a passing train, and many similar bridges had to be demolished and rebuilt, often in wrought iron. The bridge had been badly designed, being trussed with wrought iron straps, which were wrongly thought to reinforce the structure. The centres of the beams were put into bending, with the lower edge in tension, where cast iron, like masonry, is very weak. Nevertheless, cast iron continued to be used in inappropriate structural ways, until the Tay Rail Bridge disaster of 1879 cast serious doubt on the use of the material. Crucial lugs for holding tie bars and struts in the Tay Bridge had been cast integral with the columns, and they failed in the early stages of the accident. In addition, the bolt holes were also cast and not drilled. Thus, because of casting's draft angle, the tension from the tie bars was placed on the hole's edge rather than being spread over the length of the hole. The replacement bridge was built in wrought iron and steel. Further bridge collapses occurred, however, culminating in the Norwood Junction rail accident of 1891. Thousands of cast-iron rail underbridg --c7d8b370dbdcee16496b22706b69bd7e_798_5e98 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Newsletter











 

ast-iron beam bridges were used widely by the early railways, such as the Water Street Bridge in 1830 at the Manchester terminus of the Liverpool and Manchester Railway, but problems with its use became all too apparent when a new bridge carrying the Chester and Holyhead Railway across the River Dee in Chester collapsed killing five people in May 1847, less than a year after it was opened. The Dee bridge disaster was caused by excessive loading at the centre of the beam by a passing train, and many similar bridges had to be demolished and rebuilt, often in wrought iron. The bridge had been badly designed, being trussed with wrought iron straps, which were wrongly thought to reinforce the structure. The centres of the beams were put into bending, with the lower edge in tension, where cast iron, like masonry, is very weak. Nevertheless, cast iron continued to be used in inappropriate structural ways, until the Tay Rail Bridge disaster of 1879 cast serious doubt on the use of the material. Crucial lugs for holding tie bars and struts in the Tay Bridge had been cast integral with the columns, and they failed in the early stages of the accident. In addition, the bolt holes were also cast and not drilled. Thus, because of casting's draft angle, the tension from the tie bars was placed on the hole's edge rather than being spread over the length of the hole. The replacement bridge was built in wrought iron and steel. Further bridge collapses occurred, however, culminating in the Norwood Junction rail accident of 1891. Thousands of cast-iron rail underbridg








 
--c7d8b370dbdcee16496b22706b69bd7e_798_5e98--