Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list bpfk-announce); Sun, 14 Mar 2004 01:19:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.30) id 1B2RmN-0003Q5-EH for bpfk-announce@lojban.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 01:19:31 -0800 Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 01:19:31 -0800 To: bpfk-announce@lojban.org Subject: [bpfk-announce] {Please Read} lerfu Checkpoint Ends Wed, 17 Mar 2004, administrative issues Message-ID: <20040314091931.GM11847@digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 38 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: bpfk-announce-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: bpfk-announce-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: bpfk-announce@lojban.org X-list: bpfk-announce Content-Length: 1706 At Rob Speer's request, I have applied the changes Nora suggested to the 'lerfu Shifts' section; he's apparently been having trouble connecting to the wiki. At this point, there are no outstanding issues that I am aware of at all. If no-one brings up anything else, this checkpoint closes this coming Wednesday. The current vote status is as follows: I accept and agree with the current contents of "BPFK Section: lerfu Forming cmavo". 7 votes I do not accept or agree with the current contents of "BPFK Section: lerfu Forming cmavo". 1 vote I agree with the current contents of BPFK Section: lerfu 5 votes I do not agree with the current contents of BPFK Section: lerfu 1 vote I agree with the contents of BPFK Section: lerfu Shifts. 7 votes I do not agree with the contents of BPFK Section: lerfu Shifts. 1 vote The votes against were all by one person, who has not come forward to explain eir reasons, nor has responded to my private requests to do so. I consider voting against a proposal without explanation to be very strongly against the spirit of this body, but I had not made this clear in the past, so nothing will be done this time. A note about this has been added to the Procedures section. It is very strongly worded. I can't over-emphasize how important this issue is. If people who disagree with a proposal don't explain why, we can't make Lojban the best it can be. -Robin -- Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Constant neocortex override is the only thing that stops us all from running out and eating all the cookies." -- Eliezer Yudkowsky http://www.lojban.org/ *** .i cimo'o prali .ui