Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list bpfk-announce); Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:38:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1I0kSg-0003gq-De for bpfk-announce-real@lojban.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:38:03 -0700 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1I0kSf-0003gj-IU for bpfk-announce@lojban.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:38:01 -0700 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:38:01 -0700 To: bpfk-announce@lojban.org Subject: [bpfk-announce] Re: Current checkpoint Message-ID: <20070619203801.GF10939@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: bpfk-announce@lojban.org References: <925d17560706091803h3d5f192sfd55bd7e99b39560@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560706190902k51a8bf77kf59a887a7538cf16@mail.gmail.com> <20070619195935.GD10939@digitalkingdom.org> <925d17560706191333h4d81d699l838256c07305d859@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <925d17560706191333h4d81d699l838256c07305d859@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 146 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: bpfk-announce-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: bpfk-announce-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: bpfk-announce@lojban.org X-list: bpfk-announce Content-Length: 1546 On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 05:33:45PM -0300, Jorge Llambías wrote: > On 6/19/07, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > >On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 01:02:13PM -0300, Jorge Llambías wrote: > >> On 6/9/07, Jorge Llambías wrote: > >> >I propose that we set the following deadlines for voting on > >> >the "Attitudinals and Discursives" checkpoint: > >> > > >> >June 18: Digressives SEI SEhU TO TOI (Shepherd: Jorge > >> >Llambias) > >> > >> There having been no objections, and no votes against, I would > >> like to ask the jatna to declare this section checkpointed. > > > >My aplogies for being late to the party, but I'd really like to > >see some more verbiage around sei. "discursive (metalinguistic) > >bridi" doesn't have a lot of meaning by itself; can we expand on > >it a bit? Nothing serious. Perhaps "Used to express the > >speaker's state, opinion or beliefs about the surrounding > >sentence(s)."? (Assuming that's right; I never really grokked > >sei). > > > >Other than that, no objection at all. > > OK, I have added that, and a clarification from Lojbab (which I > received late because he had sent it to an account I no longer > use). We might allow a couple more days to give a chance to those > who had already voted to review. > > I edited it after you, in a gross violation of etiquette which I hope you won't mind. All I did was change BE to BE/BEI/BEhO and added be, bei, be'o to the c.f. list. -Robin