Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 23:30:10 +0200
From: Arnt Richard Johansen <arj@nvg.org>
To: bpfk-announce@lojban.org
Subject: [bpfk-announce] Re: Current checkpoint
Message-ID: <20070619213010.GF18057@nvg.org>
References: <925d17560706091803h3d5f192sfd55bd7e99b39560@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560706190902k51a8bf77kf59a887a7538cf16@mail.gmail.com> <20070619195935.GD10939@digitalkingdom.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20070619195935.GD10939@digitalkingdom.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: bpfk-announce-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: bpfk-announce-bounce@lojban.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: bpfk-announce@lojban.org
Content-Length: 1141

On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 12:59:35PM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 01:02:13PM -0300, Jorge Llambías wrote:
> > On 6/9/07, Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >I propose that we set the following deadlines for voting on the
> > >"Attitudinals and Discursives" checkpoint:
> > >
> > >June 18: Digressives SEI SEhU TO TOI (Shepherd: Jorge Llambias)
> > 
> > There having been no objections, and no votes against, I would
> > like to ask the jatna to declare this section checkpointed.
> 
> My aplogies for being late to the party, but I'd really like to see
> some more verbiage around sei.  "discursive (metalinguistic) bridi"
> doesn't have a lot of meaning by itself; can we expand on it a bit?
> Nothing serious.  Perhaps "Used to express the speaker's state,
> opinion or beliefs about the surrounding sentence(s)."?  (Assuming
> that's right; I never really grokked sei).

This is not good, because sei is also used to show who says what. E.g. "sei la .alis. cusku [...]".

-- 
Arnt Richard Johansen                                http://arj.nvg.org/
Vacuum cleaners suck. Kings rule. Ice is cool.