Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 11:11:13 -0700
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
To: bpfk@lojban.org
Subject: [BPFK] Re: New taskmaster, next checkpoint (repost due to	technical difficulties)
Message-ID: <20080929181113.GE27820@digitalkingdom.org>
References: <a25fac030809281513n2544e42dr3de8893697bff8b5@mail.gmail.com> <a25fac030809281803x7011fefdp8d3f7d2659db88d7@mail.gmail.com> <20080929180554.GH2447@nvg.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080929180554.GH2447@nvg.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Sender: bpfk-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: bpfk-bounce@lojban.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: bpfk@lojban.org
Content-Length: 1140

On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 08:05:54PM +0200, Arnt Richard Johansen wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 02:03:50PM +1300, LakMeer Kravid wrote:
> > This week I'm changing the current checkpoint to CAI, and
> > putting Irrealis on hold. It's already Friday here, so the vote
> > call for this checkpoint will be next Saturday, 4 Oct GMT.
> 
> Just a quick rundown on the terminology:
> 
> - A section is the smallest unit of BPFK work, done by a shepherd
>
> - A checkpoint is a collection of sections, which are deemed to
> belong together because of interconnectedness. A checkpoint is
> completed (approved) when all of its sections are approved.
> 
> As I understand it, you want Ted to start working on Intensifiers
> right away. Is this correct?

At this point, I actually think we shouldn't worry about shepherds
and just have everyone work on the section together.  Shepherds
hasn't been working; time to try something else.

-Robin

-- 
Lojban Reason #17: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_buffalo
Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/