Received: from mail-pv0-f189.google.com ([74.125.83.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PCAnq-00065C-64; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 05:45:00 -0700 Received: by pvh1 with SMTP id 1sf103808pvh.16 for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 05:44:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:received:received:mime-version :received:received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=VDjp68zQWKo6A0ECo/dqhS/jbOY85Jq/Gr90RL6p3+c=; b=b3l1rk09hMjpc2ZqfIM9/D441TW4aK6cgF7foXE/dgHpMYK966XsMyLrK5eNHtHLUI xJWYzyP2FNeiRv6jihCe4nYZDJL7NpaX7qTkv9rP32fNYjm6xKxbrNZrERaxqEf0T22F vRSPCA9Q0hi35uKji72eZ5h4EfQt8wsHNPNIA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=PaWYEugMEddPhXRlI8wrFmIPvGiBn/r8oTOybA1Jp53xLrulCTCm1i05KHCPcXL9P4 TM9alNuvZB+HQ3UeMUjmmccvzLZorYNOauLCXkcOgchsz+mEBAXTnpmUEkwpZ7NeipT3 rbPJzYUlSu5nk6IiI7/YeFlRi+dZkkd7UDviY= Received: by 10.142.150.9 with SMTP id x9mr123149wfd.40.1288442686250; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 05:44:46 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.142.2.41 with SMTP id 41ls3008357wfb.0.p; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 05:44:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.204.13 with SMTP id b13mr1876711wfg.67.1288442685871; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 05:44:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.204.13 with SMTP id b13mr1876710wfg.67.1288442685850; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 05:44:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org (digitalkingdom.org [173.13.139.234]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id p40si4279092wfc.6.2010.10.30.05.44.44; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 05:44:44 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of nobody@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.234 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.234; Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PCAnc-000648-H9 for bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 05:44:44 -0700 Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PCAnZ-00063Z-LV for bpfk@lojban.org; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 05:44:44 -0700 Received: by wwb31 with SMTP id 31so3980277wwb.10 for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 05:44:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.138.71 with SMTP id z7mr1500972wbt.23.1288442675323; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 05:44:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.32.140 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 05:44:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20101030050924.GT1105@digitalkingdom.org> References: <20101030050924.GT1105@digitalkingdom.org> Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 09:44:35 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] CLL Check: ke'e From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com, bpfk@lojban.org X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of nobody@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.234 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=nobody@digitalkingdom.org; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1620 On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > In the following: > > - ------------- > > The components of tanru may be grouped with =93ke=94 both before and afte= r a logical connective: >
> 12.9) =A0la .teris. cu [ke] ricfu ja pindi [=
ke'e] je ke nakni ja fetsi [ke'e]
> =A0 =A0 =A0 Terry is (rich or poor) and (male or female).
> 
> where the first =93ke ... ke'e=94 pair may be omitted altogether by the r= ule of left-grouping, but is optionally permitted (as in bridi > connection). In any case, both instances of =93ke'e=94 may be elided. > > - ------------- > > Versus the book, someone added the "(as in bridi connection)" part ond re= placed > "the last instance" with "both instances". > > Is this correct? No, as it stands it's incorrect, or at least misleading. "ke ... ke'e" cannot be used in afterthought bridi connection. Perhaps they meant "(as with "tu'e ... tu'u" in bridi connection)", or "(as in forethought bridi connection)". The contrast is with afterthought sumti and bridi-tail connections, which do not allow the first term to be grouped with "ke ... ke'e". That's probably a remnant of LALR(1) requirements, and we should consider fixing it. mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googleg= roups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-l= ist?hl=3Den.