Received: from mail-vw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bpfk-list+bncCJ2UzZHuDRCisbLeBBoEMrM2Cw@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1O3vAI-0004iv-FK; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:53:51 -0700
Received: by vws20 with SMTP id 20sf1125202vws.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:53:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received
         :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to
         :references:date:received:message-id:subject:from:to
         :x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive
         :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=3yziK2pmySZpdmzZ0fSiEJZMx5Ozbhlq2u01zJ4lWMk=;
        b=D5V9ExkWBBBogNspU7aIIK9JlsJ4oPnJvd/Qw7uSwO3EL8yZFhrJ/rOKRcTEGOMKi/
         uir9vh9/aCyOBuvbYCJJkgU2wgkFYJwjRox3bAnV3Pjb49bsvURqggzjHExheSjjLB+p
         pu7lXK6Cbf0CWjsaPG6c95piUZ+1pzWmEwp4E=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-authentication-results
         :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id
         :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        b=FDO8uvpGmnTl/T6hHCi7XVpg+gx3cUqcD++qoLHhn15m0SGlG1FJq2Vhz3wtOr/lT7
         LYd1XRtNQUJ9ET0nlMv85X0THUcW4yn8F24/Woe+Wzz9RJ7NEoDnIs9/LANQLK5l05hQ
         LJQInufvH6ngz0x7jXBPWhcHDg9jmPg+a96SE=
Received: by 10.220.127.34 with SMTP id e34mr377753vcs.32.1271699618863;
        Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:53:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.220.79.22 with SMTP id n22ls11087604vck.3.p; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 
	10:53:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.167.206 with SMTP id r14mr1236857vcy.0.1271699617538;
        Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:53:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.167.206 with SMTP id r14mr1236856vcy.0.1271699617513;
        Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:53:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qy0-f172.google.com (mail-qy0-f172.google.com [209.85.221.172])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id b14si3257431vcx.5.2010.04.19.10.53.36;
        Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:53:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.172 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.221.172;
Received: by mail-qy0-f172.google.com with SMTP id 2so5590932qyk.0
        for <bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:53:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.79.75 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:53:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201004191216.45928.phma@phma.optus.nu>
References: <201004191216.45928.phma@phma.optus.nu>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:53:36 -0300
Received: by 10.229.88.72 with SMTP id z8mr1995466qcl.3.1271699616288; Mon, 19 
	Apr 2010 10:53:36 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <q2m925d17561004191053g463a25bfh71359a69ba1e4058@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bpfk] Proposed grammar change: BIhI with only one GAhO
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: 
	domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.172 as permitted sender) 
	smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <bpfk-list.googlegroups.com>
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/post?hl=en_US>, 
	<mailto:bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en_US>
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe?hl=en_US>, 
	<mailto:bpfk-list+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe?hl=en_US>, 
	<mailto:bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 862

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
>
> Is this a sensible change?

It is sensible, but I think even more sensible would be to move
selma'o GAhO to UI, so we can say things like:

  lo sirji be ko'a ga'o bei ko'e ke'i
  "The interval between ko'a (inclusive) and ko'e (exclusive)"

Then selma'o BIhI can be merged with selma'o JOI, as the only
difference between them is whether they can take GAhO or not.

This is part of my campaign to reduce unnecessary selmaho clutter.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.