Received: from mail-vw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1O9HHa-000475-FI; Tue, 04 May 2010 05:31:31 -0700 Received: by vws20 with SMTP id 20sf2214167vws.16 for ; Tue, 04 May 2010 05:31:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=4ItSSbJTID9YBYdH53+KoxPxX/+dHFd3rKzP8ObjRGQ=; b=6F7FYYqKs20BmxSWLYSE6PEm1DzWPzQHwhV6jblAmY19t6wX2eY8+muv7V8GVI9h4P OoXW/WU45deSuCgnEy0FI0xCEGMekL7HZFEwgzNNhrRXSGvI54ekdOvqDZYeCKlWcQS4 +02Xv2aFzN8CHix2cExezxaKSBbzSYFIYgc2s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-authentication-results :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=Zk8mBQgACw0XZWYIfNL9NHPFqb5yB3vnUsNxuv4/bn2HyaujJrt0709SLlt9aNtuFT zY6LnTujPCXs+Air5i6EMv2BeF6fI2hilUnSlGoNKXcG2OQnkW/vVJii/u8W+CQABHdq hRC3OKjAqX1opSe6jW5ane0os1JnGkLmTjqQo= Received: by 10.220.107.202 with SMTP id c10mr1249610vcp.53.1272976278529; Tue, 04 May 2010 05:31:18 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.79.85 with SMTP id o21ls1399388vck.0.p; Tue, 04 May 2010 05:31:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.76.74 with SMTP id b10mr2284489vck.12.1272976277760; Tue, 04 May 2010 05:31:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.76.74 with SMTP id b10mr2284488vck.12.1272976277730; Tue, 04 May 2010 05:31:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qy0-f193.google.com (mail-qy0-f193.google.com [209.85.221.193]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id b14si4923160vcx.1.2010.05.04.05.31.16; Tue, 04 May 2010 05:31:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.193 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.221.193; Received: by mail-qy0-f193.google.com with SMTP id 31so5575505qyk.25 for ; Tue, 04 May 2010 05:31:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.105.154 with SMTP id t26mr4354316qao.325.1272976273354; Tue, 04 May 2010 05:31:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.82.11 with HTTP; Tue, 4 May 2010 05:31:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201005040105.30510.phma@phma.optus.nu> References: <201005031548.54031.phma@phma.optus.nu> <201005040105.30510.phma@phma.optus.nu> Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 09:31:13 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] Henry is on Liza's right From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.193 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 1222 On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 2:05 AM, Pierre Abbat wrote: > > What does a termset do? I'm unclear on the concept, although I have come up > with a tonguetwister using one: cire cilce carce jarco ce'e reci cilce carce > cu jarco. A termset groups a number of terms into a set so that they can be logically connected with another set of terms as blocks, when the predicate is the same for both sets of terms: mi ti lo nanmu cu dunda .ije do ta lo ninmu cu dunda {mi, ti, lo nanmu} & {do, ta, lo ninmu} cu dunda (nu'i) ge mi ti lo nanmu gi do ta lo ninmu cu dunda In your example, "cire cilce carce jarco ce'e reci cilce carce cu jarco", grouping the two terms into a set does nothing because there is no other set of terms to connect it to. (Unless you follow CLL, which finds all sorts of weird uses for termsets, incompatible with their primary use.) mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.