Received: from mail-gw0-f61.google.com ([74.125.83.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Oy8TC-00063K-Al; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:25:41 -0700 Received: by gwb11 with SMTP id 11sf5989180gwb.16 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:25:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:received:mime-version:sender :received:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=vhjVN4ZAkU0xVPu18AjQ1zExcYxfZmIV82fmOXc9pfU=; b=T+tZsdbZmd1GZLUpzuOi4NWhPPBqsyTV78fsW+wl2uL1wux7vFUe6+GxHTTHG3hnh7 NoCbQgXa/y//iliAwrcOTCH3k8tKwIutufniFlXcFLrt8YpJFGytrmEzqae1wrScSR+R JmKMWrItjPCA4AMxCdKVTGesYDweAixrCe7rQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=RBvS4iuTzW7kQxRyxnNcLwz2S4bLkSEpRCXHFydZmOaNG0HcOiSJn45NtKw8uFV9bG IACbNCTYGqzYI5UlN3KVeAHlvQQXkPL7PJUAd21FEMWThcXDu8soX+Vc57L92dVy/QeX MiSN8KUsiyqJvBWwsCKBeGUOWrRjsdk8I8xEI= Received: by 10.101.141.14 with SMTP id t14mr425697ann.13.1285097126496; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:25:26 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.101.208.33 with SMTP id k33ls2110528anq.0.p; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:25:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.253.14 with SMTP id a14mr8482671ani.10.1285097126296; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:25:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.253.14 with SMTP id a14mr8482670ani.10.1285097126265; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:25:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-yx0-f175.google.com (mail-yx0-f175.google.com [209.85.213.175]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id h19si7938957anm.9.2010.09.21.12.25.25; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:25:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of johnwcowan@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.175 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.213.175; Received: by yxg6 with SMTP id 6so2391952yxg.34 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:25:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.101.1.6 with SMTP id d6mr1207144ani.151.1285097125125; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:25:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.100.94.8 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:25:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100921185708.GB30871@digitalkingdom.org> References: <2de88d23-c009-41e9-bb9c-86d1425b1b64@k1g2000prl.googlegroups.com> <-3659970292795760364@unknownmsgid> <20100921185708.GB30871@digitalkingdom.org> From: John Cowan Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 15:25:05 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: xorxes' idea of UI, as interpreted (was Re: [bpfk] Re: The Case for UI.) To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: johnwcowan@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of johnwcowan@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.175 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=johnwcowan@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 1695 On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 09:19:35PM +0200, Daniel Brockman wrote: >> You don't think xorxes's opinion (all emotional indicators are >> vague as to whether the sentence is an assertion or a >> hypothetical, although some are usually used with hypothetical >> sentences due to the emotion most often occurring simultaneously >> as someone compares alternate universes, and some are usually used >> with assertions due to the emotion usually occurring as someone >> experiences or thinks about a fact, and you can always force one >> or the other using {da'i} or {ju'a}) is a serious one? I find that totally convincing, including the mention of da'i and ju'a. As I said in Section 13.3 of the Red Book: In fact, the entire distinction between pure emotions and propositional attitudes is itself a bit shaky: ``.u'u'' can be seen as a propositional attitude indicator meaning ``I regret that ...'', and ``a'e'' (discussed below) can be seen as a pure emotion meaning ``I'm awake/aware''. The division of the attitudinals into pure-emotion and propositional-attitude classes in this chapter is mostly by way of explanation; it is not intended to permit firm rulings on specific points. Attitudinals are the part of Lojban most distant from the ``logical language'' aspect. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.