Received: from mail-wy0-f189.google.com ([74.125.82.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ot364-0006Gt-TP; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:41:01 -0700 Received: by wyb35 with SMTP id 35sf1387508wyb.16 for ; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:40:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=z0nzhq+rNPizQh+C2iFlf2H0J5//BFdFHzGQ6KJ4XVc=; b=UImfkQNezXvv6smaSBI44piLRIF4Fi+Oa4zC+Y4LSxiOjfe741ItACP4symYeCKyGU erUYUZpijGSodeZep1YnT+HqJQ80/xDtTzl2+1TmyqokLiu05ixZgOCVMcOXRILmEe9W jVunQ+FXD0g4dnX2werhZ39G/KOy1CqLtbBEs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=w01+HnB6I8NST+l532/xB/S8zibWndIfKvCCgxkuzcZFW/fuxQHBwXkmaGzYe9kk5I iJ3V3cB8DuOgYAzhhbmdQk8Xew2JanbATpU8b4cIcXPyelkAmR0k6ZXlNJkmLf3aNH63 S4RVJXe+x60P6cE3RQyTdCtK80T9k+LN4xJ14= Received: by 10.216.145.130 with SMTP id p2mr930577wej.7.1283884833065; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:40:33 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.216.237.134 with SMTP id y6ls2262415weq.2.p; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:40:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.36.137 with SMTP id w9mr454055wea.0.1283884832409; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:40:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.36.137 with SMTP id w9mr454054wea.0.1283884832373; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:40:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wy0-f170.google.com (mail-wy0-f170.google.com [74.125.82.170]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id o46si2367574weq.2.2010.09.07.11.40.31; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:40:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.170 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.170; Received: by mail-wy0-f170.google.com with SMTP id 19so9946844wyf.1 for ; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:40:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.54.9 with SMTP id h9mr14550wec.34.1283884317379; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:31:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.46.4 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 11:31:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20100903032539.GY5990@digitalkingdom.org> Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 12:31:56 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] BPFK work From: Jonathan Jones To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.170 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016367f9696ab8d9a048faf9c54 Content-Length: 8246 --0016367f9696ab8d9a048faf9c54 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2010/9/7 Jorge Llamb=EDas > On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > > 2010/9/7 Jorge Llamb=EDas > >> > >> Shouldn't you be doing red sections only? Black sections already have > >> someone assigned to them. (I'm not sure what the difference between > >> blue and black is. Blue are the ones worked on anonymously and black > >> are the ones that someone has claimed?) > > > > My understanding is, if it isn't green, it needs to be voted on, if it > isn't > > blue, it needs work done to it, and if it isn't either, it needs both. > > That's not what the instructions on the page say. They say that "blue" > is for completed community work. It doesn't say that completed > individual work has to be blue. Almost all of my sections are > completed and waiting to be checkpointed, but they are in black. At > the top of the page it says that you should feel free to work on _red_ > sections, not black ones. But I don't really claim to fully understand > what the system is supposed to be. If people want to work on one of my > sections, I don't have a problem with that, but then please remove my > name as shepherd for the section. > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > This is what it says on the page describing the Community Work project: The Procedure Here's what you do: - Log in to your account here; register if necessary (it's in the upper right) - Make sure your email here is valid; see the preferences page - Ignore anything else you've ever heard about BPFK procedures - Pick a section *that isn't green* on the BPFK Sectionspag= e. Pick a cmavo in that section that looks unfinished. Do the following: - Grab your CLL, or use one of the online versions. Figure out what the cmavo means. Write it down. See the templates below. - Do *NOT* describe its category in general; it is sufficient to say that something is "an attitudinal"; you do not need to talk about how attitudinals in general work at all. - Do describe how it is different from other members of its category. - Find (or, if you really can't find any, make) examples of usage of the cmavo; use the Corporapage for this. - Search the mailing list [ima= ge: (external link)], or anything else that seems relevant, for debate about the nature of the cmavo or its category. Make notes of any you find, seperate from the body of the definition. .... Section Colours For the colors, Blue means "completed but not voted on"; you should mark an= y section that appears finished blue. Green means "completed and voted on"; please do not touch those! --=20 mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.a'o.e'e ko klama le bende pe denpa bu --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googleg= roups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-l= ist?hl=3Den. --0016367f9696ab8d9a048faf9c54 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
2010/9/7 Jorge Llamb=EDas <= jjllambias@gmail.com>=
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/9/7 Jorge Llamb=EDas <= jjllambias@gmail.com>
>>
>> Shouldn't you be doing red sections on= ly? Black sections already have
>> someone assigned to them. (I'm not sure what the difference be= tween
>> blue and black is. Blue are the ones worked on anonymously and bla= ck
>> are the ones that someone has claimed?)
>
> My understanding is, if it isn't green, it= needs to be voted on, if it isn't
> blue, it needs work done to it, and if it isn't either, it needs b= oth.

That's not what the instructions on the page say. They say that &= quot;blue"
is for completed community work. It doesn't say that completed
individual work has to be blue. Almost all of my sections are
completed and waiting to be checkpointed, but they are in black. At
the top of the page it says that you should feel free to work on _red_
sections, not black ones. But I don't really claim to fully understand<= br> what the system is supposed to be. If people want to work on one of my
sections, I don't have a problem with that, but then please remove my name as shepherd for the section.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

This is what it sa= ys on the page describing the Community Work project:

The Procedure

Here's what you do:

  • Log in to your account here; register if necessary (it's in th= e upper right)
  • Make sure your email here is valid; see the prefere= nces page
  • Ignore anything else you've ever heard about BPFK procedures
  • Pick a section *that isn't green* on the BPFK Sections page. Pick a cmavo in that section th= at looks unfinished. Do the following:
    • Grab your CLL, or use one of the online versions. Figure out what= the cmavo means. Write it down. See the templates below.
      • Do NOT describe its category in general; it is=20 sufficient to say that something is "an attitudinal"; you do not = need to talk about how attitudinals in general work at all.
      • Do describe how it is different from other members of its categor= y.
    • Find (or, if you really can't find any, make) examp= les of usage of the cmavo; use the Corpora p= age for this.
    • Search the mailing lis= t, or anything else that seems relevant, for debate about the nature of=20 the cmavo or its category. Make notes of any you find, seperate from=20 the body of the definition.
....

Section Colours

For the colors, Blue means "completed but not voted on"; you s= hould mark any section that appears finished blue. Green means "completed and voted on"; please do not touch those!



--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.a'= ;o.e'e ko klama le bende pe denpa bu

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googleg= roups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-l= ist?hl=3Den.
--0016367f9696ab8d9a048faf9c54--