Received: from mail-pv0-f189.google.com ([74.125.83.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ot3By-0006dt-3X; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:47:06 -0700 Received: by pvc7 with SMTP id 7sf512020pvc.16 for ; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:46:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RjHlhatAc6uu2NQ42OSOFQewXhEpDBHzK9Xn0n7jOxg=; b=essABiRCpGAiE84Kux+/OqqEOfVqL5whxkHbM8qEWunrJEfvhMN8QATgTgly9jN8SX OmgYskXqTyur+F2NjkgUzQsBHcikUh/8bGn/3p5UsFdbVzvXrJr3kGqU6chBcE0eNocf xM4BT9xKMMcK1Jfk8E0ycoxGC8aubqfnuhjJ8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding; b=A9WosgXxAVzzVWBxOQbC2IcyKqsBJJ3n+wXqO9giXQBIdq0plet4+/enPg7AlwxsFk 8jwVFoAC5suzy+4I8oVQLjPZ4xXuuL9GfzEC+ehVG4V3pwr1LAMwiYPsyKWn3jcjh5Tq bFGd0KUx+zU8tJwu7dTi5+8ddV5u7bebZQqMg= Received: by 10.143.21.32 with SMTP id y32mr123458wfi.48.1283885199100; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:46:39 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.142.117.2 with SMTP id p2ls645331wfc.1.p; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:46:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.165.13 with SMTP id n13mr1003089wfe.10.1283885197389; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:46:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.165.13 with SMTP id n13mr1003088wfe.10.1283885197347; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:46:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org (chain.digitalkingdom.org [64.81.66.169]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id k8si5538126wfa.2.2010.09.07.11.46.37; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:46:37 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 64.81.66.169 as permitted sender) client-ip=64.81.66.169; Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ot3Bj-0006dT-VY for bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:46:36 -0700 Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 11:46:35 -0700 From: Robin Lee Powell To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [bpfk] BPFK work Message-ID: <20100907184635.GU5990@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com References: <20100907184142.GT5990@digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Original-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 64.81.66.169 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 3208 On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 12:44:16PM -0600, Jonathan Jones wrote: > On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Robin Lee Powell < > rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote: >=20 > > On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 03:15:10PM -0300, Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Jonathan Jones > > wrote: > > > > 2010/9/7 Jorge Llamb=EDas > > > >> > > > >> Shouldn't you be doing red sections only? Black sections already h= ave > > > >> someone assigned to them. (I'm not sure what the difference betwee= n > > > >> blue and black is. Blue are the ones worked on anonymously and bla= ck > > > >> are the ones that someone has claimed?) > > > > > > > > My understanding is, if it isn't green, it needs to be voted on, if= it > > isn't > > > > blue, it needs work done to it, and if it isn't either, it needs bo= th. > > > > > > That's not what the instructions on the page say. They say that > > > "blue" is for completed community work. It doesn't say that > > > completed individual work has to be blue. Almost all of my > > > sections are completed and waiting to be checkpointed, but they > > > are in black. At the top of the page it says that you should feel > > > free to work on _red_ sections, not black ones. > > > > That's correct; please don't touch secitons with assigned shepherds > > that seem to have had significant work done on them. If no work has > > been done, just remove the shepherd's name and do as you like. > > > > -Robin > > > > -- > > http://singinst.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. > > Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot > > is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false" > > is "na nei". My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/ > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Grou= ps > > "BPFK" group. > > To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=3Den. > > > Since .xorxes. says all his sections are completed, why don't we > just mark them blue? That'll tell people not to touch them and > mark them as "ready for voting" all at once, and it means that 19 > more sections are ready in one fell swoop. I don't think they *all* are completed, but yes, as you see shepherded sections that look complete, feel free to mark them blue. -Robin --=20 http://singinst.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false" is "na nei". My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/ --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googleg= roups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-l= ist?hl=3Den.