Received: from mail-wy0-f189.google.com ([74.125.82.189])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <bpfk-list+bncCJ2UzZHuDRCTl5vkBBoEMv6qgQ@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1Ot7eh-0006JD-G4; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:32:50 -0700
Received: by wyb35 with SMTP id 35sf1445846wyb.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:32:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received
         :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received
         :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive
         :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=PSGQQ/ALmer9EQ8McSum7a2qTgwminI5LcAAyiecUl8=;
        b=kPGnTLGoZADXYkhhwxyBdVX9Y5ZCQHSakV7/xFCVLgJritawFK/qoVlrFO5oIbJpc9
         lcD3EU29OtpuxA0tHzYQHJAqlKirYQ8sg07iLweN4pyX845v3ldEBg1L13Po3+iQ3KRs
         4V4R79K45zy75b/596Hzel3LnHcQwP6RItnMk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=NyrMYe4GkTBybc7qxfLeUpLY5UuF8wBw0VMCZ0Y/3yUz5X/W0ASMbgzoWpCjRKtpY1
         V+s3adOWRyZUphAMTya/KqIOYhHLni67cIyPEerC7xwDhWH5g0HW6CXrC517P5nbeK0m
         y+tMT62PzRDxXgBAZNqSUEJjiCpMbECe/EP2k=
Received: by 10.216.145.135 with SMTP id p7mr1007591wej.11.1283902355475;
        Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:32:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.227.139.159 with SMTP id e31ls1806726wbu.0.p; Tue, 07 Sep 2010
 16:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.158.11 with SMTP id d11mr293684wbx.29.1283902354762;
        Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.158.11 with SMTP id d11mr293683wbx.29.1283902354729;
        Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ww0-f52.google.com (mail-ww0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id a37si2567698wba.7.2010.09.07.16.32.33;
        Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:32:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.52 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.52;
Received: by wwb28 with SMTP id 28so6131573wwb.21
        for <bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:32:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.129.130 with SMTP id o2mr289863wbs.116.1283902353423; Tue,
 07 Sep 2010 16:32:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.151.203 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 16:32:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2582948a-ed7c-4c90-9319-dbd8caa242d0@u5g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
References: <AANLkTincpLaVC8qAkVv=rhoY-OS4zVvUBE-FLyU-=km-@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=9Gq718J_z=wL=d=jCVFFhhxZKgmE7K6KHzfqh@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinEWipK_Bfpxvq79R7A8L9N4-poLYRgQspGNshp@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100903032539.GY5990@digitalkingdom.org>
	<AANLkTimhpiKfpJHajxQYfLLdhxOrzV33zy4HhfdK1Msk@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinGyEz71X9iLYY-bHMAomQP=6TAvJgWTBhhUMnE@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimCAcSqCZPUXCZFQFPkzimGH7a7fE72xTisiQSn@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimHoh=yoGK2xQxVQC4WX+Y_xkV2R08shOPo12H_@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTindXsErpzaVmPyBp0Z1=Z_0Top0__e2pn7XwzWG@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=4jCJZrtKJXEYjb7Xg0cZ8SF_7ZcjOQ+NYkGhc@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100907184815.GV5990@digitalkingdom.org>
	<AANLkTimbXQZUWjebKKPMhkufcJMO7biPUAc1iLa7q2d+@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimVKgYeSJtSOSguzVtWpVRAbzPDsiCVr1sPR4fp@mail.gmail.com>
	<2582948a-ed7c-4c90-9319-dbd8caa242d0@u5g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 20:32:33 -0300
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=fwEhntBzfwzd3GuLsz1r_KLgF-JnRb-23p=uk@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bpfk] Re: BPFK work
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.52 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <bpfk-list.googlegroups.com>
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en_US>
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe?hl=en_US>,
 <mailto:bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Length: 1427

On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Lindar <lindarthebard@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I don't find anything wrong with the formatting, and I as well as
> several others have spent literally hours trying to update the
> formatting. =3D\

Do you actually use these pages as reference? when you need to find a
cmavo for some meaning or the meaning of some cmavo?   For the latter
there is jbovlaste, but what do you do when you know the selma'o you
need, but don't remember the exact word? If you don't use them, you
may not realize how difficult they are to read.

> Could you list, perhaps, some of the features or ideas behind the
> design that you would like?

Readability, mostly.

> Searchability is one, obviously.
> Anything else?
> Perhaps for UI we could have a special exception and list it on a
> grid?
>
> =A0 =A0'A =A0'E =A0'I =A0'O =A0'U =A0 A =A0 E =A0 I =A0 O =A0 U
> A
> E
> I
> O
> U
>
> Maybe?

I'm happy with the current (non-standard) format for UI. Compare the
page for UI with one with the standard format, do you really not see a
difference in readability?

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googleg=
roups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-l=
ist?hl=3Den.