Received: from mail-ww0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P4jGL-0000bp-Lr; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 16:55:41 -0700 Received: by wwe15 with SMTP id 15sf531824wwe.16 for ; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 16:55:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZX47AjSPPX++gyG92Pc/EQQoi19ui1IcCFKi5qQ5HEE=; b=mbmL9RCNKCLcoHn+5wVwrDaje4wBg8iZbZAEjyP3+WLGLBx1GyOqPYG6JIDMbx14sR j0LYYvlRwCYwcH/FZeQe7UZpEj/eOgoAwI0RdcVcBM0UTbwftQh30ZZ7L09X45V5hsGc 9QsF7N3JFM8lnyliTuBHXTfKPltXC2tv7k4Mk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=JAmv3b7WPAMgkmQpnSNSUeFAABoU4//n+ti4XcfGa5ju3nitR1+FxZUQeC7sUjbNHI dTddD4MhUThOj1DXndNTXUICMAoyvkgQB7bf8fYvrvCG/sJKkAKQdX6u38fVdEI8aBS4 /+Uf6GCDgtVaLNVREKYGx6nMfwwnE7kFsburc= Received: by 10.216.145.132 with SMTP id p4mr722310wej.20.1286668525221; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 16:55:25 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.227.168.134 with SMTP id u6ls751163wby.1.p; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 16:55:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.3.21 with SMTP id 21mr184307wbl.1.1286668524336; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 16:55:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.3.21 with SMTP id 21mr184306wbl.1.1286668524309; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 16:55:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ww0-f54.google.com (mail-ww0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id w33si253590wbd.6.2010.10.09.16.55.23; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 16:55:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.54 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.54; Received: by wwb17 with SMTP id 17so2742229wwb.35 for ; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 16:55:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.135.8 with SMTP id l8mr4010554wbt.224.1286668522981; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 16:55:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.145.130 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Oct 2010 16:55:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6632159152572093565@unknownmsgid> References: <20100903032539.GY5990@digitalkingdom.org> <8136604407292225759@unknownmsgid> <6632159152572093565@unknownmsgid> Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 20:55:22 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] BPFK work From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.54 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1556 On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Daniel Brockman wrote= : >> If it's an existing selma'o, then either UI or BAhE are the best choices= , I think. Even they will fail if the first speaker ends with ZO or ZEI tho= ugh, because you wouldn't be able to complete with what you really want to = complete. You would need to use some additional trick with SI. > > I honestly don't understand what you are talking about here. A: la'e di'u smuni zo ... B: ? What does B say? Suppose B wants to complete A's sentence with "blablabla". Suppose the "continue preceding speaker's utterance" cmavo is "di'ai". So: B: di'ai blablabla Now the full text is "la'e di'u smuni zo di'ai blablabla". But that's not what B wanted. So B has to say: B: di'ai si zo blablabla which gives "la'e di'u smuni zo di'ai si zo blablabla". Since "si" will delete "zo di'ai", then B gets what they wanted. That's what I meant by a trick with SI. But I now realise there's a problem with that too. What if B said "di'ai" by mistake, and he wanted to delete it? Now B's text will be construed as continuing A's, and B has no way out of it. I suppose B has to resort to "fa'o" then to get out of A's text. mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googleg= roups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-l= ist?hl=3Den.