Received: from mail-gw0-f61.google.com ([74.125.83.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P4jLx-0000vh-T5; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 17:01:28 -0700 Received: by gwj21 with SMTP id 21sf789691gwj.16 for ; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 17:01:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=X5fnn4PS0q4+fayUQOA66gdd+8lY2kCbQefXj+Yz+YQ=; b=MxYW4Tfce/6TL6fg+jD2HC59V/o1dsIe2qhfgcvPx94IbK6BCqdpSjzAy/nL07jY/c VTecJjE6quRqkoarhR5RJ0//uQ0E2JN5Rvmrk71zAbsTQpDiw8oKgHkf0CuVq4wPUEIc PhzrqbSiYY+/j7/1fE/geXfJyg3gDgLPtM6zg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=xANVSn3tJ6MnfPxfCXscqkghO8k2lB+DQBMFdKfhNVWlsmZGuEPLkanYxY2ZcZxL2E eF6HXfmrLNKyNXQ2pXlWnYveD7DIqw46Awv+ubVLiPgSG1SoKoyVh7/18k7cVgsfZceh haixtXbWz62J/LvbG1KGN7ExWPaIeTqn4TAvM= Received: by 10.91.17.18 with SMTP id u18mr337873agi.5.1286668874332; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 17:01:14 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.231.112.41 with SMTP id u41ls1081834ibp.1.p; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 17:01:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.183.11 with SMTP id ce11mr1238385ibb.5.1286668874003; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 17:01:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.183.11 with SMTP id ce11mr1238374ibb.5.1286668873956; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 17:01:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-iw0-f177.google.com (mail-iw0-f177.google.com [209.85.214.177]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id b32si2877091ibq.1.2010.10.09.17.01.12; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 17:01:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.177 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.177; Received: by mail-iw0-f177.google.com with SMTP id 5so23128iwn.36 for ; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 17:01:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.160.77 with SMTP id m13mr3617747ibx.22.1286668872353; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 17:01:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.206.68 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Oct 2010 17:01:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20100903032539.GY5990@digitalkingdom.org> <8136604407292225759@unknownmsgid> <6632159152572093565@unknownmsgid> Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 18:01:12 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] BPFK work From: Jonathan Jones To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.177 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d447ef14890a049237f1de Content-Length: 5334 --0016e6d447ef14890a049237f1de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2010/10/9 Jorge Llamb=EDas > On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Daniel Brockman > wrote: > >> If it's an existing selma'o, then either UI or BAhE are the best > choices, I think. Even they will fail if the first speaker ends with ZO o= r > ZEI though, because you wouldn't be able to complete with what you really > want to complete. You would need to use some additional trick with SI. > > > > I honestly don't understand what you are talking about here. > > A: la'e di'u smuni zo ... > B: ? > > What does B say? Suppose B wants to complete A's sentence with > "blablabla". Suppose the "continue preceding speaker's utterance" > cmavo is "di'ai". So: > > B: di'ai blablabla > > Now the full text is "la'e di'u smuni zo di'ai blablabla". But that's > not what B wanted. So B has to say: > > B: di'ai si zo blablabla > > which gives "la'e di'u smuni zo di'ai si zo blablabla". > > Since "si" will delete "zo di'ai", then B gets what they wanted. > That's what I meant by a trick with SI. > > But I now realise there's a problem with that too. What if B said > "di'ai" by mistake, and he wanted to delete it? Now B's text will be > construed as continuing A's, and B has no way out of it. I suppose B > has to resort to "fa'o" then to get out of A's text. > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > I thought the working of the "continue jufra" cmavo was that it would be removed from the result, so that A: la'e di'u smuni zo B: di'ai blablabla becomes la'edi'u smuni zo blablabla If di'ai deletes itself, the problem would be keeping it from doing so, not what you're describing. --=20 mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi luk. mi patfu d= o zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googleg= roups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-l= ist?hl=3Den. --0016e6d447ef14890a049237f1de Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
2010/10/9 Jorge Llamb=EDas <= ;jjllambias@gmail.com>
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Daniel Brockman <dbrockman@gmail.com> wrote:
>> If it's an existing selma'o, then either UI or BAhE are th= e best choices, I think. Even they will fail if the first speaker ends with= ZO or ZEI though, because you wouldn't be able to complete with what y= ou really want to complete. You would need to use some additional trick wit= h SI.
>
> I honestly don't understand what you are talking about here.

A: la'e di'u smuni zo ...
B: ?

What does B say? Suppose B wants to complete A's sentence with
"blablabla". Suppose the "continue preceding speaker's u= tterance"
cmavo is "di'ai". So:

B: di'ai blablabla

Now the full text is "la'e di'u smuni zo di'ai blablabla&q= uot;. But that's
not what B wanted. So B has to say:

B: di'ai si zo blablabla

which gives "la'e di'u smuni zo di'ai si zo blablabla"= ;.

Since "si" will delete "zo di'ai", then B gets what= they wanted.
That's what I meant by a trick with SI.

But I now realise there's a problem with that too. What if B said
"di'ai" by mistake, and he wanted to delete it? Now B's t= ext will be
construed as continuing A's, and B has no way out of it. I suppose B has to resort to "fa'o" then to get out of A's text.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

I thought the working of the "continue ju= fra" cmavo was that it would be removed from the result, so that
A: la'e di'u smuni zo
B: di'ai blablabla

becomes
la'edi'u smuni zo blablabla

If di'ai deletes itself,= the problem would be keeping it from doing so, not what you're describ= ing.

--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.a'= ;o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi luk. mi patfu d= o zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googleg= roups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-l= ist?hl=3Den.
--0016e6d447ef14890a049237f1de--