Received: from mail-ww0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <bpfk-list+bncCJ2UzZHuDRCyyMjlBBoE2C8VuQ@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1P52f1-0004g1-06; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 13:38:25 -0700
Received: by wwe15 with SMTP id 15sf660207wwe.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 13:38:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received
         :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received
         :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive
         :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=Nw1l9vNSRifVhwefS3tOS5LNcTjwCO56dASwyDzQc5U=;
        b=GgolSxRDOWjpOFzOinaaNJtlnDLgOssR1bUvdpHZT7OxNAJ8Bf5SLxmx+tLVC332kK
         FqOdimmadFNE+RRFJF30YmTM2tCiVPRqq2l+GFCrNaNUNfiEu1rXYE8eoHAJdTPZsi6x
         kNRGtnSTvXEqrZrR62gR0Gj9GNa/2E056Hz+g=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        b=fADp7YsJuqZzVhvNLe/yIhmsmjrvxESxoNCgoRcbFRSvM9TdKGmy6DIUq5Q1n6jzU3
         XC7j6e6UnTZDSCV6SkF8v4XpX/Tp+m8eP94rK8A0iAIa3o5Em9pkAFcsfDmk52OkQpQs
         hvvaqvZP4A9JWD7zNxu7+/V/3U2Utso5JYPLU=
Received: by 10.216.237.35 with SMTP id x35mr31698weq.20.1286743090206;
        Sun, 10 Oct 2010 13:38:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.227.3.19 with SMTP id 19ls914457wbl.3.p; Sun, 10 Oct 2010
 13:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.144.207 with SMTP id a15mr219705wbv.15.1286743089552;
        Sun, 10 Oct 2010 13:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.144.207 with SMTP id a15mr219704wbv.15.1286743089518;
        Sun, 10 Oct 2010 13:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ww0-f47.google.com (mail-ww0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id x33si2586560wbs.5.2010.10.10.13.38.08;
        Sun, 10 Oct 2010 13:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.47 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.47;
Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so3539794wwf.4
        for <bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 13:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.43.9 with SMTP id u9mr4836722wbe.41.1286743088031; Sun, 10
 Oct 2010 13:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.145.130 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 13:38:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=5rsT0HCwd+aO+Pyt-2r6Q06jxss0zk2e+B+LE@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=2R1tYqwGzuL1oLN448q-aB3BHEcB4Z9h+5FBs@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi==Q=kQm6ZFWySFQSu3cT4pGOEBtk_-pZZ2F7A_@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimx_LkkfjE3LgtK7rXcE05T9rSH1nNDKexDUczk@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinz1db56tSt5u8_A0684cRAxgtw1k_uFcsMb26W@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimjOXsxMKa6LYbBBMzf=hT4-dtC7nGdbEi5MY8v@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimC7b5dj4nLKgeYwzajwpPwdddWKV+RMY652cJS@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=eDLMoqz7UKajDehXxEKYROX6fwYdPwT9LGE=o@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimE=ynAZ5cVrsUXB6ULrgfj8ts_QknS6QM=hFgz@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikfmXw8qE7L6e9d1KA=vcE3+_2-x3oB9sU-tY3w@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimsi5eFPPfbLFg7jgDnA-3rNXX+6UkMw852CBMk@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinaNdo3eTkWBwdKgUYHobmOUPMKNd1zHkAC_KzG@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikROXvZ0J_KtzpkqxjMhXYVGY2WkBoWbidHJUoG@mail.gmail.com>
	<4CB0B239.50107@lojban.org>
	<AANLkTimzz=Exgf-94tnkebibZs8ZhtmO_Z9meeorSLKj@mail.gmail.com>
	<4CB1F3EA.5000608@lojban.org>
	<AANLkTi=-z=KfdA3EQYF-g2Ab9v=PXCHZGr0g=17RBF3j@mail.gmail.com>
	<4CB20ADF.6050500@lojban.org>
	<AANLkTikJQAkx145XeQBC=f5KBq0wyLz_yd4wgkCH8Bbk@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinFLROKSf7WLn3r82hHVLGUjTUx6VLG=MereADY@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimU6eie6HXqfVYWCKEYxBEn=uvyRk+oRbsCSyGv@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=5rsT0HCwd+aO+Pyt-2r6Q06jxss0zk2e+B+LE@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 17:38:07 -0300
Message-ID: <AANLkTimVM9COtdvBy6oH66imQOmMWXbumv3GQjYw8JhG@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bpfk] BPFK work
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.47 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <bpfk-list.googlegroups.com>
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en_US>
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe?hl=en_US>,
 <mailto:bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 1091

On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Also, if you remember, my pragmatic decision as to whether a new speaker = a
> new text is determined by whether the new speaker begins with {.i} or
> {ni'o}, i.e. it is a continuation if not, and a next text if so.,

What does that buy you? What advantage do you see in treating the
utterances produced by different speakers in a conversation as if they
were a single text?

I see the disadvantages (you lose the information that a text has a
speaker which is referred to as "mi" in the text and an audience which
is referred to as "do" in the text), but I still can't see the
advantages. What are the advantages of treating the whole conversation
as one text?

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.