Received: from mail-wy0-f189.google.com ([74.125.82.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P5mj6-00009H-5f; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:49:43 -0700 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20sf444068wye.16 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:49:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=kxVi+5M+taqZD12C06Jt+TNRlMaeiatoUTowehiYvMM=; b=P1WLO3SY1ErJEQCHVU2RKZmTQ2CRnav0coXiKmYtwNb8FiOV5iPJ92DFg/7XYHs4KZ rCyBfg9dpjB3w33VgXQL19hC5uVI4FLfv8tUjs4wK3wz4CAMrjUq+Pf/pFQIrbKKvnxm BclWRYulpV04WDLj2rJ8UQT2RGxPeB94PgHMs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=Jef+AsImz/cl/zYYvvOZJztNRbiiSDHvpqOzG31H8/Yzs1masbzhneFqMWGN+3241n 9aebeJdquhBC13Wfqhqyci7mXRwtJ7UizDaO8dPt5wov0orHeGYFr+YmVlRQCF7WELVC 29dQUL3Jiw1nsaqqbGqFjTuUuea+a0VWRtGxc= Received: by 10.216.237.34 with SMTP id x34mr63883weq.25.1286920166935; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:49:26 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.216.213.1 with SMTP id z1ls167525weo.1.p; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:49:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.73.202 with SMTP id v52mr25070wed.6.1286920163513; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:49:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.73.202 with SMTP id v52mr25069wed.6.1286920163500; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:49:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wy0-f171.google.com (mail-wy0-f171.google.com [74.125.82.171]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id x80si1199946weq.4.2010.10.12.14.49.22; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:49:22 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.171 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.171; Received: by mail-wy0-f171.google.com with SMTP id 21so3050304wya.2 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:49:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.142.75 with SMTP id p11mr7885468wbu.27.1286920162242; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:49:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.145.130 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:49:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:49:22 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] Re: {.i} and {ni'o}, continuation or new jufra From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.171 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 1459 On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Adam Lopresto wrote: > "conversation" is the new top-level rule in the parser. it gracefully > degrades to just a single text. > So given an exchange in IRC > A: do klama ma > B: lo zarci > We can either parse each line completely independently, or we can make our > logs in a parseable format thus: > A: fa'ai do klama ma fa'o > B: fa'ai lo zarci fa'o > > That entire block is a single lojban conversation, and can be parsed. So the conversation generator gets a sequence of "text"s as input and outputs one "conversation", right? All it does is surround each text with fa'ai/fa'o (when they are not already present, I suppose) and then outputs their concatenation. That seems simple enough. The problem I see is that we must already have the string of texts to feed the conversationer. You can't feed it the string of phonemes "do klama ma lo zarci" and expect it to split it into two texts, you must feed it first chunk "do klama ma", second chunk "lo zarci". In other words, the hard work will be done somewhere else, not by the conversationer. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.