Received: from mail-gx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.161.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P4NHe-0005mO-Sy; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 17:27:33 -0700 Received: by gxk9 with SMTP id 9sf1553440gxk.16 for ; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 17:27:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=Ic41aNnksF/WG7seSqqn1eAKgNstQB+EwZ2hAjEy6HY=; b=tDNHco1vq2iVTYZ2cBn/RPFsPUPDgSBL1hAR2QR0JdX77+HqkwX5N2yN+LdgpTKfeG SUV3ScX2AzfiU4f32e32zJK5Rh9/lYwkekKm1nDSzC7OAoWYtvojxHneS3t4ALzTtA38 XzgGY3VIqf9AqzFP8r4OoZJ0AX/PJFT5KE53I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=wqQCeAk72qTG3OA6vH6WOs/0dVrktU+r+p3B2UZf9yyJcFre6p0oNCLV+u+0vyC50d Xbm/6Sa6oYMkdsCrDrGvOmUzybKLXgqnOdSnWWfkXs8Y8Swg+q2Y+SdGI01r9ApL5T7z XCIaU4yVvm/AOFZvQKNPDD5dB2z9wj4WfVKKs= Received: by 10.90.57.40 with SMTP id f40mr273599aga.42.1286584039053; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 17:27:19 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.231.180.73 with SMTP id bt9ls641859ibb.0.p; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 17:27:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.35.77 with SMTP id o13mr896989ibd.3.1286584038795; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 17:27:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.35.77 with SMTP id o13mr896987ibd.3.1286584038751; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 17:27:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-iw0-f170.google.com (mail-iw0-f170.google.com [209.85.214.170]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id cm31si2523062ibb.3.2010.10.08.17.27.17; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 17:27:17 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.170 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.170; Received: by iwn5 with SMTP id 5so154685iwn.29 for ; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 17:27:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.99.145 with SMTP id w17mr516433icn.125.1286584036522; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 17:27:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.206.16 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Oct 2010 17:27:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20100903032539.GY5990@digitalkingdom.org> Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 18:27:16 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] BPFK work From: Jonathan Jones To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.170 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba613ee2787bf1049224307c Content-Length: 5064 --90e6ba613ee2787bf1049224307c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2010/10/8 Jorge Llamb=EDas > On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > > > > It marked as me being shepherd because the content is almost entirely > mine. > > I wasn't under the impression that only a shepherd could edit a > shepherded > > section, only that (s)he was the one /assigned/ to. > > I don't really know what the rules are. I prefer that if something is > under my name, then other people not change what I write. But I'm > perfectly happy to cede any of "my" sections to anyone who wants it, I > just don't want it to be under my name if somebody else is editing it. > For that reason I don't like editing other people's sections either. > (Unless it's something minor like a typo, but not something like we > are discussing here.) > > > > And in {.ienai .i li'o} it attaches to the more likely than not elided > > {vau}? > > It doesn't really attach to anything, but it is definitely not part of > the bridi after ".i" > > > .i mi nelci lo va blanu gerku > > .ienai .i ta ba'e na blanu > > > > That looks to me like disagreement that it's a dog. > > If the second line is by a second person, it's like a new text. It > doesn't have to be taken as one single text. > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > I don't think it /has/ to. I merely think it /should/. For the following reason: lo verba cu cusku lu .i mi nelci lo mi cnino .yyyyyyyy. li'u .i lo vy mamta cu cusku lu mlatu li'u .i lo verba ku .e lo mamta cu cusku lu .i mi nelci l= o mi cnino .yyyyyyyy. mlatu li'u --=20 mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi luk. mi patfu d= o zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googleg= roups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-l= ist?hl=3Den. --90e6ba613ee2787bf1049224307c Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
2010/10/8 Jorge Llamb=EDas <= ;jjllambias@gmail.com>
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It marked as me being shepherd because the content is almost entirely = mine.
> I wasn't under the impression that only a shepherd could edit a sh= epherded
> section, only that (s)he was the one /assigned/ to.

I don't really know what the rules are. I prefer that if somethin= g is
under my name, then other people not change what I write. But I'm
perfectly happy to cede any of "my" sections to anyone who wants = it, I
just don't want it to be under my name if somebody else is editing it.<= br> For that reason I don't like editing other people's sections either= .
(Unless it's something minor like a typo, but not something like we
are discussing here.)


> And in {.ienai .i li'o} it attaches to the more likely than not el= ided
> {vau}?

It doesn't really attach to anything, but it is definitely not pa= rt of
the bridi after ".i"

> .i mi nelci lo va blanu gerku
> .ienai .i ta ba'e na blanu
>
> That looks to me like disagreement that it's a dog.

If the second line is by a second person, it's like a new text. I= t
doesn't have to be taken as one single text.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

I don't think it /= has/ to. I merely think it /should/. For the following reason:

lo ve= rba cu cusku lu .i mi nelci lo mi cnino .yyyyyyyy. li'u .i lo vy mamta = cu cusku lu mlatu li'u .i lo verba ku .e lo mamta cu cusku lu .i mi nel= ci lo mi cnino .yyyyyyyy. mlatu li'u

--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le= bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to= the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googleg= roups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-l= ist?hl=3Den.
--90e6ba613ee2787bf1049224307c--