Received: from mail-fx0-f61.google.com ([209.85.161.61])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <bpfk-list+bncCJ2UzZHuDRDI_r7lBBoEswAwSw@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1P4NqG-0007Wh-MW; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:03:20 -0700
Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17sf309822fxm.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:03:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received
         :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received
         :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive
         :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=LkwhI01deRwkm5Rn75zHrN9i5hLIASHS1PULWsa1E+0=;
        b=xIi/zGjhoYdzKxO6BgcPZ8m+xb0uwBubc/CtYNYQ6tu5bsIEUzO59on64HXi16ETTb
         l38FOacmSHc1HxnwqHNV7u+bIr63h0ZNcMcAwhjejkPEZl3Vyg70yIFYZJ9co9lrwmcV
         44YoU+/kO5lNbbkorXDhmyB1oAQgn2F+PP2Lk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        b=edstCLtKeE+/gUtH4eheGUAWcNuV6/gTiBUwIecZCOJIm93A1htWiqo/0W3kplJUry
         BQ3Wv5DwFQ6A2jn29AvXmJBRfNwVLz6WjY0wNLedPEOMxRlOBoYa0DvZIIDz+aXRpQB4
         AG+PxTKKuMb5Ga1hrJNY028hpqAYdCmh6mut4=
Received: by 10.223.91.81 with SMTP id l17mr140336fam.0.1286586184249;
        Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:03:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.204.48.209 with SMTP id s17ls528769bkf.2.p; Fri, 08 Oct 2010
 18:03:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.73.205 with SMTP id r13mr123800bkj.22.1286586183749;
        Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:03:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.73.205 with SMTP id r13mr123799bkj.22.1286586183714;
        Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:03:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f51.google.com (mail-fx0-f51.google.com [209.85.161.51])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id z17si2176988bkb.3.2010.10.08.18.03.02;
        Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:03:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.51 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.51;
Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so1194984fxm.24
        for <bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:03:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.239.187.205 with SMTP id m13mr208524hbh.127.1286586182384;
 Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:03:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.239.162.66 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Oct 2010 18:03:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=eDLMoqz7UKajDehXxEKYROX6fwYdPwT9LGE=o@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=2R1tYqwGzuL1oLN448q-aB3BHEcB4Z9h+5FBs@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTincpLaVC8qAkVv=rhoY-OS4zVvUBE-FLyU-=km-@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=9Gq718J_z=wL=d=jCVFFhhxZKgmE7K6KHzfqh@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinEWipK_Bfpxvq79R7A8L9N4-poLYRgQspGNshp@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100903032539.GY5990@digitalkingdom.org>
	<AANLkTimhpiKfpJHajxQYfLLdhxOrzV33zy4HhfdK1Msk@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinGyEz71X9iLYY-bHMAomQP=6TAvJgWTBhhUMnE@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimCAcSqCZPUXCZFQFPkzimGH7a7fE72xTisiQSn@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinKGVWW7tfi2RnZEmAAfxpcDWbNdEa8mDoWzf04@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimzONSvL1p5p9HD0VNwxBXBHc4UJA4jm9js=ZeL@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=cV1C=zkjUXPShBZ5JE0MgHFmce+qecR9y+J4m@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinrQHWvVgw7fVKtpwedSqwkQ8E85cN44nWWkT-=@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikzPOvqPJctcAEsGZ3foib_Lc9w=oqD3w3GS07+@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimi+KZ9RV0zoLnD_nN-vo3KshCQdpAu8ma20TZM@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinNXCzAc_+_f=9jSoG2O-Mup1i8T3bPECE85XYv@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTik4+xEqqGdodPE1B=XvJGoL1o0saavdchE8aNWY@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi==Q=kQm6ZFWySFQSu3cT4pGOEBtk_-pZZ2F7A_@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimx_LkkfjE3LgtK7rXcE05T9rSH1nNDKexDUczk@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinz1db56tSt5u8_A0684cRAxgtw1k_uFcsMb26W@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimjOXsxMKa6LYbBBMzf=hT4-dtC7nGdbEi5MY8v@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimC7b5dj4nLKgeYwzajwpPwdddWKV+RMY652cJS@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=eDLMoqz7UKajDehXxEKYROX6fwYdPwT9LGE=o@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 22:03:02 -0300
Message-ID: <AANLkTimE=ynAZ5cVrsUXB6ULrgfj8ts_QknS6QM=hFgz@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bpfk] BPFK work
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.51 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <bpfk-list.googlegroups.com>
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en_US>
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe?hl=en_US>,
 <mailto:bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 1144

On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> My point is, if something said by a second person is always treated as
> separate text, how does the mother finish her child's sentence?

How can we be 100% sure that she intends to do it? We can't. I think
And Rosta did propose a cmavo for indicating "continuation of previous
speaker's utterance" once. You might find it in the experimental cmavo
page.

> And since Lojban is supposed to be umambiguous, it has to be one way or the
> other. Either a new speaker is always a new jufra, or only at the next {.i},
> which is my preferred reading. (Or listening.)

A new speaker is by default a new text. Anything else is unreasonable,
since it makes your utterances dependent on things you may not have
control over.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.