Received: from mail-gw0-f61.google.com ([74.125.83.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P4PGE-0003hl-NF; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 19:34:13 -0700 Received: by gwb11 with SMTP id 11sf1591969gwb.16 for ; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 19:34:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=40ce6ThbkQhs6mJv1byTgour4vGl1zBWCcOJpsyv3gc=; b=vBH8Rf5PMEUxgFvS8J3sxL2f8ZZOfIBYtF16DFP7QZiMtkXf75BDkdz+KVF/crTblb UESy2D7MhP7bJWnyXlqXfZJmPJL6bKH2ql8IoTFtJp+TzkMvYKXUcffRfI4fv9JMHH6x pHmECgARQYmju3crLc+xKMBsibF+3C6rPkPzE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=QmVq6QpXOZu2Qkddr6kZSs4OIS2Xl6BxdC4TzFya5sGfDwGVhq22BCv6Z56JiGwMdB rS9WfHOR0Pz/PaUpWuuY5YIZ21CgS6koIBOUx7mum74biRra4YuM5Jk7sV8/d38UynKe NsQKzRTz5D6NJxM2jUMd3WHhRRrWzsKoEvw2s= Received: by 10.90.5.17 with SMTP id 17mr278103age.21.1286591638731; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 19:33:58 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.231.123.203 with SMTP id q11ls740965ibr.2.p; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 19:33:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.10.132 with SMTP id p4mr935032ibp.1.1286591638537; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 19:33:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.10.132 with SMTP id p4mr935031ibp.1.1286591638496; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 19:33:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-iw0-f178.google.com (mail-iw0-f178.google.com [209.85.214.178]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id e4si2588099ibc.0.2010.10.08.19.33.57; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 19:33:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.178 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.178; Received: by iwn35 with SMTP id 35so111793iwn.23 for ; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 19:33:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.245.66 with SMTP id lt2mr62636icb.116.1286591634394; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 19:33:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.206.68 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Oct 2010 19:33:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20100903032539.GY5990@digitalkingdom.org> Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 20:33:54 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] BPFK work From: Jonathan Jones To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.178 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba3fd22156cf50049225f551 Content-Length: 4080 --90e6ba3fd22156cf50049225f551 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2010/10/8 Jorge Llamb=EDas > On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:05 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote= : > > > > It is the only method I can think of that maintain unambiguity while > > preserving the ability to continue someone else's sentence. > > I'm sure Robin will be ecstatic if you ask him to modify the grammar > so that I/NIhO in a new voice have a different grammar than in the > current voice. > > > So unless > > someone has a better suggestion, it's either that or it is not possible > to > > continue someone else's sentence, ever. The latter will cause all > Lojbanic > > twins to hate you, btw. zo'o > > Deciding where a new text starts (and where it ends) is necessarily a > pragmatic endeavor. If the twins want to be parsed as if only one > person was speaking that's fine, but it's a pragmatic decision that > has to be made by the listener every time. > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > That is a statement in favour of ambiguity! I've already stated the "pragmatic" decision I make regarding a new voice. Does the grammar even /deal/ with multiple voices? --=20 mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi luk. mi patfu d= o zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googleg= roups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-l= ist?hl=3Den. --90e6ba3fd22156cf50049225f551 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
2010/10/8 Jorge Llamb=EDas <= ;jjllambias@gmail.com>
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:05 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It is the only method I can think of that maintain unambiguity while > preserving the ability to continue someone else's sentence.

I'm sure Robin will be ecstatic if you ask him to modify the gram= mar
so that I/NIhO in a new voice have a different grammar than in the
current voice.

> So unless
> someone has a better suggestion, it's either that or it is not pos= sible to
> continue someone else's sentence, ever. The latter will cause all = Lojbanic
> twins to hate you, btw. zo'o

Deciding where a new text starts (and where it ends) is necessarily a=
pragmatic endeavor. If the twins want to be parsed as if only one
person was speaking that's fine, but it's a pragmatic decision that=
has to be made by the listener every time.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

That= is a statement in favour of ambiguity! I've already stated the "p= ragmatic" decision I make regarding a new voice. Does the grammar even= /deal/ with multiple voices?

--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le= bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to= the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googleg= roups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-l= ist?hl=3Den.
--90e6ba3fd22156cf50049225f551--