Received: from mail-ww0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P62Zz-0003se-MZ; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:45:27 -0700 Received: by wwe15 with SMTP id 15sf1596549wwe.16 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:45:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=x2KjX6cxaR1IofJrJeoYpUt1lTwNxRHVuC0Lw92UrOg=; b=HRnVu7gP/glbI5qELeIZn085rp+AhXKl70LrJD3SJjfFR5mo1d3GZf13vFGwJJ4opP FBpKISYsVLfC2jYttoPrOiL24tWLgKOplz7+0xnK1Ocf2kaT3PKdSgn0OcnwH95XHVdw gGDZQG06bqwmbRiBzjZTLpFqexJqxSJBAELEA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=Omp1xnNib/c4j7fZytrk388QbPz6XhS5fCkXNgfo9eLceKZhOrxzDh6W7lTlhZODkU 8JYWacdc7vAiawVfbskvGqkIBk291+xZcLBsNSrxIU1G95hdXHcYSotRpeSdT9fFDP2R /XCy6NYoGljeWUk50UY7mBZaExKZYNK6OJ+vo= Received: by 10.216.237.34 with SMTP id x34mr222132weq.25.1286981106855; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:45:06 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.227.39.10 with SMTP id d10ls425585wbe.2.p; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:45:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.74.5 with SMTP id w5mr5386wed.5.1286981106025; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:45:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.74.5 with SMTP id w5mr5385wed.5.1286981106010; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:45:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id v4si3009684weq.9.2010.10.13.07.45.04; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:45:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.53 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.53; Received: by mail-ww0-f53.google.com with SMTP id 33so4619100wwc.34 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:45:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.155.143 with SMTP id s15mr8299165wbw.154.1286981102928; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:45:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.145.130 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:45:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <3443a11a-dc47-4efe-8501-4bdd78333ccf@y32g2000prc.googlegroups.com> Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:45:02 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] Re: {.i} and {ni'o}, continuation or new jufra From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.53 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 1279 On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Daniel Brockman wrote: > I still think {fa'ei} should provide some way to indicate > which text you are continuing. By formal grammar or just for the benefit of the human audience? Do you mean the parser should be told to append this text to the text three texts back, or do you mean that the speaker is just informing the audience that they are adding something to what John said some time before? It seems to me that the whole idea of appending by syntax is going to be an unworkable quagmire, especially if you allow appending a non-text to another non-text so that the result is a valid text. If all you are talking about is some kind of announcement by the speaker that their text is a continuation (in terms of ideas, not in terms of syntax) to somebody else's text, that can of course be done with SEI, COI, etc. If you are talking syntax, I still don't see it. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.