Received: from mail-ww0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <bpfk-list+bncCJ2UzZHuDRCL3N7lBBoElpjodQ@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1P6Z5N-00063i-8z; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 18:27:55 -0700
Received: by wwe15 with SMTP id 15sf160953wwe.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 18:27:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received
         :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received
         :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive
         :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=i/Jb0z4FfoQs2cY/s9XMrvtjYEfQoG8d7sOOW4Rp1YQ=;
        b=02dyVVCildzsTQEttUQBov/1HSsy/X5m40Hf4CWCRAg/WEYha+0C6hcVam63Ld1c7U
         ExvB9lSLlYBWRfa+AuuwCb5Dea8QEECBfyVL+4je5LDe09rZoHIAxZnkCFhbtKvqVobn
         CcKiYOfeaIindHPFDFF5Ur//Cpbi98gdYL6mQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        b=sFdov/Wzi9OG8zYux3tG1tlUIbBOB2CL7xjxbE7b81dVa4zDUMMtu0gjrV/a9HaRKI
         rZYskhGxqhJg9QIqabLLGOC1zmqv9KW6pojgRys84fpfWsYGlAg+PvLtSNvv8Pufkfpf
         9FHk9Sb+NF8JNC27XnXcnIzGWXgSx7Q8L3p3A=
Received: by 10.216.240.140 with SMTP id e12mr432620wer.0.1287106059956;
        Thu, 14 Oct 2010 18:27:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.216.213.1 with SMTP id z1ls1299941weo.1.p; Thu, 14 Oct 2010
 18:27:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.48.68 with SMTP id u46mr46028web.12.1287106059096;
        Thu, 14 Oct 2010 18:27:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.48.68 with SMTP id u46mr46027web.12.1287106058960;
        Thu, 14 Oct 2010 18:27:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ww0-f51.google.com (mail-ww0-f51.google.com [74.125.82.51])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id l5si741131weq.7.2010.10.14.18.27.37;
        Thu, 14 Oct 2010 18:27:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.51 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.51;
Received: by wwb28 with SMTP id 28so314674wwb.20
        for <bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 18:27:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.143.143 with SMTP id v15mr136598wbu.157.1287104291922;
 Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:58:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.145.130 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:58:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimtjNTWQZFufc2bsXXF-9DQ2G-MtzcUpGv0+jcN@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=t7xuRNj1qK2hoy9tKBhOMjf1MBhRZiG8R6TNE@mail.gmail.com>
	<20101014221058.GC15812@digitalkingdom.org>
	<AANLkTimtjNTWQZFufc2bsXXF-9DQ2G-MtzcUpGv0+jcN@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 21:58:11 -0300
Message-ID: <AANLkTimjT7wtJXMWUq==OtF7awbe97VTROUPODnKpfdy@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bpfk] BPFK work - getting it done.
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.51 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <bpfk-list.googlegroups.com>
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en_US>
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe?hl=en_US>,
 <mailto:bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 1258

On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
> I officially declare {baba} as evil.

There is really no reason to have a special definition for "ba ba". I
thought we had decided to remove it from the list of definitions.

> Based on it meaning "will be going to",
> I've determined that it is the "Durational (progressive/continuous) Aspects
> in Future" from this wikipedia page:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_tense

That's not right though. There is no indication of aspect in "ba ba".

And in any case, the "Durational (progressive/continuous) Aspects in
Future" is "I will be going" as in "I will be singing". Don't confuse
"I will be going (home)",  with "I will be going to (sing)", where
"go" is used as an auxiliary.

But neither of those is "ba ba" in any case. "I will be going" is "mi
ba ca'o klama", and "I will be going to sing" is "mi ba pu'o klama".

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.