Received: from mail-pw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.160.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PAjZD-0006Gs-Dd; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 06:27:58 -0700 Received: by pwi7 with SMTP id 7sf1521931pwi.16 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 06:27:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:x-authority-analysis:x-cloudmark-score :x-originating-ip:received:received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:message-id:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=JsTzTpsGD1ht8LbWEOO2N8SHOAaCOkVLRE+Cqfv/Je4=; b=OdqfGA0BWFVPvbCQTWVVXwn6swICkM/AMLXDPNt10q6rLPOePgSbTRMot9PoCjIrOX qBC6Fu0XHZovxCDv3q0oorcscZdXzWFLfk2mg54KXjMyHimBdMRxIs8pYlxEKLn3KW3p y7DkHDRg75Ir2uc3hSqAXPrhps+zpburWehN8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-authority-analysis:x-cloudmark-score :x-originating-ip:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:message-id:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; b=2w1Va4ojuQKezQyaodHimVXGXv1rGKYthepBlJtigzlwGl91/QBpEemLRkKwXzXfQT tD0eG0gQO32c4vdhWLXoCYS0frbLPXbC5hU5t3GedaZOCsiFdylJLFQEfsprx8y7j7/w 3psJSBi641tAC8FdfQRFuWESYhaP1rljaC7Pg= Received: by 10.142.56.11 with SMTP id e11mr72985wfa.58.1288099663863; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 06:27:43 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.142.6.9 with SMTP id 9ls10513924wff.3.p; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 06:27:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.32.4 with SMTP id k4mr1225024wfj.71.1288099663339; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 06:27:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.32.4 with SMTP id k4mr1225023wfj.71.1288099663305; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 06:27:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com [75.180.132.123]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id s21si19042811wff.0.2010.10.26.06.27.42; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 06:27:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 75.180.132.123 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) client-ip=75.180.132.123; X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=3jtQBdTzPyV+fq4oCU/u8ZPrJJGN11HvhaDVxyWhycI= c=1 sm=0 a=VjtRSD_9mBwA:10 a=wPDyFdB5xvgA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=9o99xeNKNPYSmM5t9x5+TQ==:17 a=u0fgA0lzDM2jI0Koxy8A:9 a=4bnsCMAdE6utzmKEHI-ChSK9P-YA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=9o99xeNKNPYSmM5t9x5+TQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 75.176.118.168 Received: from [75.176.118.168] ([75.176.118.168:46621] helo=chausie) by cdptpa-oedge02.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 61/2F-02631-E47D6CC4; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:27:42 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id D254BE82A for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:27:39 -0400 (EDT) From: Pierre Abbat To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [bpfk] type-3 fu'ivla with different kinds of rafsi Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:27:35 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) References: <201010260117.28780.phma@phma.optus.nu> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201010260927.37640.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-Original-Sender: phma@phma.optus.nu X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 75.180.132.123 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) smtp.mail=phma@phma.optus.nu Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Content-Length: 1290 On Tuesday 26 October 2010 08:23:29 Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote: > I would require the body of the fu'ivla (the part after the hyphen) to > start with a valid initial, and then that kind of ambiguity can never > arise. That would invalidate both "cmacrntegrale" and "bangrblgaria". I don't thin= k=20 it's necessary to require this, as the set of foreign words beginning=20 with "rn" or "rln" or other consonant clusters that give this trouble is=20 pretty small compared to the set of foreign words that begin with valid=20 medials that aren't valid initials. Should the Book be edited to 1. specify that if a fu'ivla can be interpreted as beginning with CVC or CV= CC,=20 then CVCC takes precedence? I think this would be a clarification, not a=20 change. 2. specify that a type-3 fu'ivla cannot begin with CVV or CCV? This would b= e a=20 change, and would require removing the example "djarspageti". Pierre --=20 li fi'u vu'u fi'u fi'u du li pa --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googleg= roups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-l= ist?hl=3Den.