Received: from mail-pz0-f61.google.com ([209.85.210.61])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <bpfk-list+bncCK30vq5WEM-unOYEGgRQk3pm@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1PAnpS-000534-P3; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:01:01 -0700
Received: by pzk6 with SMTP id 6sf1358225pzk.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:00:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received
         :received:received-spf:received:date:from:to:subject:message-id
         :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent
         :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive
         :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type
         :content-disposition;
        bh=oxq1+t4JIgpQQk9Y1UrCGclo551oJdjcxiO76VhNWoc=;
        b=tVnmRK5tHtf0ibWIuTw/OKwksWJRkiG9UU5biS+HqhckJpK11g+csD/OWl5nSo1r4g
         Vhx137DkQOLuv1dmSDcYfobnVPSWhHH2cvlTQtj90iqWPqTKgPTJxTUTuw/+smK8++sZ
         kBrjg9VVCAYod2sJUrOuG3PZPTd+v6lc8leqE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id
         :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent
         :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive
         :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type
         :content-disposition;
        b=cE+xxa9zXaPPtJefR1DTHyWnd3v7MdZIe7X/qA0naUTcBTI2ujdL64hDYIN7FAfeq7
         g3FXPqOmkx9DK3NuTn3kGsS/IlaStbZD+wpWcBfMftNsq7RxvBbUvcTvg142oGFtyqav
         r67IoPMv4bw/Uf4hyZz/RUgHah7AEvtUp4HWY=
Received: by 10.143.26.28 with SMTP id d28mr414186wfj.35.1288116047302;
        Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:00:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.142.78.15 with SMTP id a15ls10551614wfb.2.p; Tue, 26 Oct 2010
 11:00:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.142.193.8 with SMTP id q8mr5136424wff.27.1288116046720;
        Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:00:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.142.193.8 with SMTP id q8mr5136422wff.27.1288116046677;
        Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:00:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org (digitalkingdom.org [173.13.139.234])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id s21si19561677wff.4.2010.10.26.11.00.46;
        Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:00:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.234 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.234;
Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>)
	id 1PAnpG-00052G-47
	for bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:00:46 -0700
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:00:46 -0700
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [bpfk] CLL errata check: lujvo scoring
Message-ID: <20101026180046.GN1105@digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
References: <20101026061117.GJ1105@digitalkingdom.org>
 <AANLkTi=ToPejrh4c8o76h2tpjvSw6gcEBmNT2PG_SzqU@mail.gmail.com>
 <20101026063822.GK1105@digitalkingdom.org>
 <20101026063932.GL1105@digitalkingdom.org>
 <7.0.1.0.2.20101026134742.01f61b78@cox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20101026134742.01f61b78@cox.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Original-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates
 173.13.139.234 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <bpfk-list.googlegroups.com>
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en_US>
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe?hl=en_US>,
 <mailto:bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Length: 2044

On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 01:56:00PM -0400, Nora LeChevalier wrote:
> At 02:39 AM 10/26/2010, Robin wrote:
> >Oh, also, it means the actual formally written out immediately
> >before is wrong, and possibly some of the surrounding verbiage.
> >
> >It also makes negative lujvo possible, which seems icky.
> >
> >-Robin
> [snip]
> >> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 02:33:56AM -0400, John Cowan wrote:
> >> > At the last minute we (which I think means Nora) decided to subtract
> >> > everything from 32500 so that higher values = better lujvo.  12.1
> >> > obviously got missed, so your fix is just the wrong way round.
> 
>   In the program, a max of 6 pieces was handled.

Ah.  That changes things.

> Looking at calculations in my lujvo-making program ( I presume this
> is what you're referring to?), higher is better score:
>
>
>         Luj.LujScore := (32 - length(Luj.Lujvo)) * 1000
>                       + ApostTot * 500
>                       + (5 - HyphenCount) * 100
>                       + TypeTot * 10
>                       + VowelTot;

Thaaaaaaat's not *remotely* like what's in *any* version of the
book.  Every book version has both positive and negative segments.
It also doesn't have the 6 piece limit.

I'd really prefer to change the book as little as possible.  That
means lower score is better.  Is it *really* important that we flip
it around, especially at the expense of limiting the alg's
applicability?

-Robin

-- 
http://singinst.org/ :  Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot
is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false"
is "na nei".   My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.