Received: from mail-gx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.161.189])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <bpfk-list+bncCKnwz67vDhDqpcTmBBoExZpVKw@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1PDY1d-0002Db-UA; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 00:44:57 -0700
Received: by gxk28 with SMTP id 28sf636990gxk.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 00:44:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:mime-version
         :received:received:date:in-reply-to:x-ip:references:user-agent
         :x-http-useragent:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help
         :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=hgRvUqQnOi0EQVMoGnX6HFxxQGijQRM2cpVLRu1JDfQ=;
        b=hjct2sXNn4HRIrnUSU3/ZrntXgy0M7/CjfR91Ey1ThYv1sPvkafGoV0Bxi4AG0yoie
         7cWs3G8b7l+dWpNdQ+YNMO2M9nftPB7HmOs7dSgbM0Iy47BhdBKY6MsiN28oO5ZWU+Mn
         56g7T87Uu40dssTeGzvWQSUQ9zPihkciNr38E=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:mime-version:date:in-reply-to:x-ip:references
         :user-agent:x-http-useragent:message-id:subject:from:to
         :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id
         :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=aSjbUmiHDZZJJi1eWJHijunciy1TB7RSzR515WLUYaC7gXDtYMN7shZGiTCZuaHYk+
         mWBe/mdbmNP6i8qBxIfqDTrArSia0GaMKpVhpr4BACImU/Sj8NRORdPVnzDriefOILGU
         Y8Xg5ovu7ti0iRnFX5xE6CfCX5A4rsTgGGIak=
Received: by 10.91.45.31 with SMTP id x31mr31217agj.9.1288770282138;
        Wed, 03 Nov 2010 00:44:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.90.9.34 with SMTP id 34ls185561agi.1.p; Wed, 03 Nov 2010
 00:44:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.91.16.6 with SMTP id t6mr32903agi.11.1288770281896; Wed, 03
 Nov 2010 00:44:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by s5g2000yqm.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 00:44:41
 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 00:44:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=bvzFVcaEo6BP_RWJOMorJs_+-UXGQcNV_4XWu@mail.gmail.com>
X-IP: 66.92.8.187
References: <20101014071951.GU24066@digitalkingdom.org> <AANLkTi=ci5z2JjBMteEQDJPHz1ZTLvTja1RnDP=hF19S@mail.gmail.com>
 <20101016180339.GG25393@digitalkingdom.org> <AANLkTi=bvzFVcaEo6BP_RWJOMorJs_+-UXGQcNV_4XWu@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.11
 (KHTML, like Gecko) Ubuntu/10.04 Chromium/9.0.567.0 Chrome/9.0.567.0 Safari/534.11,gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <04f85321-58b3-4d56-98f0-e50182fa3a9e@s5g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
Subject: [bpfk] Re: What I'm going to do.
From: bancus <ted.reed@gmail.com>
To: BPFK <bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
X-Original-Sender: ted.reed@gmail.com
Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <bpfk-list.googlegroups.com>
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en_US>
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe?hl=en_US>,
 <mailto:bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Length: 1496

On Oct 16, 12:27=A0pm, Jorge Llamb=EDas <jjllamb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As you pointed out, the BPFK currently has a very informal structure.
> The only structured part for now is the jatna position. Therefore,
> until another structure develops, the yearly "State of the Language"
> report will be issued by the jatna in the name of the BPFK, with the
> final decision on its contents fully at the jatna's discretion.
>
> Of course we all expect and know that the jatna will take the job
> seriously and make whatever consultations they deem necessary before
> acting, but the final decision is the jatna's alone. They might for
> example prepare a draft report two weeks before January 1st, ask for
> comments, and then make their decision based on the feedback they
> receive, or whatever other method they find suitable to prepare the
> report. The report is about the "State of the Language", not about the
> "Final Definition of the Language from Here to Eternity", so there's
> no reason to worry if it's not perfect in every minor detail.
>

For what it's worth, I agree with all of this and believe that Robin
would excel as this sort of jatna.

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googleg=
roups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-l=
ist?hl=3Den.