Received: from mail-pv0-f189.google.com ([74.125.83.189])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <bpfk-list+bncCK30vq5WEIa52OgEGgTYuHA4@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1PWX2Y-0001zj-Fv; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 08:32:22 -0800
Received: by pvh1 with SMTP id 1sf2968092pvh.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 08:32:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received
         :received:received-spf:received:received:date:from:to:subject
         :message-id:mail-followup-to:mime-version:user-agent
         :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive
         :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type
         :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=wdxV3VZZoW+6d3CCnVwgqhd8TrzPBYiVLtKXsU4T5Rg=;
        b=oKkAeEzM4/oQOJJZd7ollp2Ypn+1vUFM+O+MFpy/5Q6oNQL0dkmvKXjWbGQvYRdQLa
         WXCCMiceeGlrV9estK5wOC9c18SHJdhH+TE7QUNFCkjRuhsmbUs/EfxNd1xQsCUVZ5UT
         PCwjm4pw+3A+drfYhnHc8xMp435JhKamSr+js=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id
         :mail-followup-to:mime-version:user-agent:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        b=mmGs8SIoDE1j66UWW3ueTGlt5gubMyFUGocSQ/NtmmjFV6eRD0EspWe7drLlPMmrAA
         NyZMj79aCwwgjI7Q/d0AMAvSAoWof3MHvel96W3H1O40JXj+AsMRyRHeGSlEwqEoURM5
         zR9jWyhAHkY4aouaCSKY+mvGNP7ELNTEyGafw=
Received: by 10.143.26.32 with SMTP id d32mr526237wfj.16.1293294726807;
        Sat, 25 Dec 2010 08:32:06 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.142.2.41 with SMTP id 41ls11747652wfb.0.p; Sat, 25 Dec 2010
 08:32:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.142.192.21 with SMTP id p21mr7866475wff.55.1293294725990;
        Sat, 25 Dec 2010 08:32:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.142.192.21 with SMTP id p21mr7866474wff.55.1293294725964;
        Sat, 25 Dec 2010 08:32:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org (digitalkingdom.org [173.13.139.234])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n6si10808531wfl.3.2010.12.25.08.32.05
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Sat, 25 Dec 2010 08:32:05 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of nobody@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.234 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.234;
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>)
	id 1PWX2K-0001pO-6y
	for bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 08:32:04 -0800
Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>)
	id 1PWX2J-0001ou-N9
	for bpfk@lojban.org; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 08:32:03 -0800
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 08:32:03 -0800
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
To: bpfk@lojban.org
Subject: [bpfk] lololol whole other missing section.
Message-ID: <20101225163203.GB29638@digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: bpfk@lojban.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Original-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 best guess record for domain of nobody@digitalkingdom.org designates
 173.13.139.234 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=nobody@digitalkingdom.org
Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <bpfk-list.googlegroups.com>
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en_US>
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe?hl=en_US>,
 <mailto:bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Length: 3429


- ------------------------------------

<dl compact><p><p><cx "tosmabru test">  XE "tosmabru test"
<dt>5)  <dd>Test all forms with one or more initial CVC-form rafsi =97 with=
 the pattern "CVC=A0<dots>=85</dots>CVC + X=94 =97 for "tosmabru fa
ilure=94. X must either be a CVCCV long rafsi that happens to have a permis=
sible initial pair as the consonant cluster, or is somethin
g which has caused a "y=94-hyphen to be installed between the previous CVC =
and itself by one of the above rules.
                The test is as follows:
<p><p>
<dt>5a) <dd>Examine all the C/C consonant pairs that join the CVC rafsi, an=
d also the pair between the last CVC and the X portion, i
gnoring any "y=94-hyphen before the X.
        These consonant pairs are called "joints=94.
<p><p>
<dt>5b) <dd>If all of those joints are permissible initials, then the trial=
 word will break up into a cmavo and a shorter brivla. If
 not, the word will not break up, and no further hyphens are needed.
<p><p>
<dt>5c) <dd>Install a "y=94-hyphen at the first such joint.
</dl>
<p><p>Note that the "tosmabru test=94 implies that the algorithm will be mo=
re efficient if rafsi junctures are tested for required hyp
hens from right to left, instead of from left to right; when the test is re=
quired, it cannot be completed until hyphenation to the r
ight has been determined.
<p>

- ------------------------------------

      <varlistentry>
        <term>5)</term>
        <listitem>
          <para>Test all forms with one or more initial CVC-form rafsi - wi=
th the pattern
          <quote>CVC ... CVC + X</quote>- for
          <quote>tosmabru failure</quote>. X must either be a CVCCV long ra=
fsi that happens to have a permissible initial pair as the consonant cluste=
r, or is something which has caused a
          <!-- ^^   long rafsi: definition, 57 -->
          <indexterm type=3D"general">
            <primary>long rafsi</primary>
          </indexterm>
          <quote>y</quote>-hyphen to be installed between the previous CVC =
and itself by one of the above rules.</para>
        </listitem>
      </varlistentry>
    </variablelist>
    <para>Note that the
    <quote>tosmabru test</quote> implies that the algorithm will be more ef=
ficient if rafsi junctures are tested for required hyphens from right to le=
ft, instead of from left to right; when the test is required, it cannot be =
completed until hyphenation to the right has been determined.</para>
    <!-- ^^   tosmabru test, 71 -->
    <indexterm type=3D"general">
      <primary>tosmabru test</primary>
    </indexterm>
    <!-- ^^   hyphens: use of, 59 -->
    <indexterm type=3D"general">
      <primary>hyphens</primary>
    </indexterm>
  </section>

- ------------------------------------

-_-

*Pure luck* that I found this one, too.

-Robin

--=20
http://singinst.org/ :  Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot
is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false"
is "na nei".   My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googleg=
roups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-l=
ist?hl=3Den.