Received: from mail-gy0-f189.google.com ([209.85.160.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PagP4-00017V-UR; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 19:20:46 -0800 Received: by gyb11 with SMTP id 11sf14577374gyb.16 for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 19:20:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:mime-version :received:received:date:x-ip:user-agent:x-http-useragent:message-id :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=oqtES2uxErTQrmKz5wVTnOwbvw1s+p7T2+uZcoDvuio=; b=NmY6rz6+lw3r2IWPrmsnVix+NyyVnm8wtflZH4nhSiFc6MzofBV4pmyW3U5UuCqWcp OBYQe7pmjLXksqdP2ddm26wo+lk3B0caVhmxDfF6S1TKURGZoNZqNQvc21dieLBNRBTx rKeJXSo/KlYgMFbFJDK85q9Z+Wng69oU+ExiU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:mime-version:date:x-ip:user-agent:x-http-useragent :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence :mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=1UqdW1HmuSRL4kHd+HLl1VcE72QcWPUVg5/U27UMqkwiRobicKfO8g22KHtyeu2Bmc snBuhR3oczihsRS3JF0QsduzZ15KwEnUVFW8NR2ZEBhGjVSFvpYpvlbR5IFk0PQAE0Dg uGVy/5/TTL7Qf0EdUtsuzLCaFYUnWxSkJ/uZ4= Received: by 10.90.17.6 with SMTP id 6mr99551agq.1.1294284030524; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 19:20:30 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.90.149.10 with SMTP id w10ls3932361agd.1.p; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 19:20:30 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.91.109.14 with SMTP id l14mr100362agm.21.1294284030304; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 19:20:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by o14g2000yqe.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 19:20:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 19:20:30 -0800 (PST) X-IP: 70.26.52.118 User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101227 Conkeror/0.9.2 (Debian-0.9.2+git100804-1),gzip(gfe) Message-ID: <643df517-e3f5-446c-a26e-16ba8478f87b@o14g2000yqe.googlegroups.com> Subject: [bpfk] Should *every* use of every lojban word be cross-referenced? From: Zort To: BPFK X-Original-Sender: eitanp32@gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 1134 The question came up when I asked Robin whether I could remove the indexterm in: coi FIXME: TAG SPOT <anchor xml:id="c6e11d3"/> coi. djan. Hello, John. even though the corresponding Lojban word isn't wrapped in a specifically (the TODO says to remove these types of indexterms when there is such a wrapped Lojban word nearby). Me: Dunno, can't we just mark every single indextermed word, then later if we feel like it tell the computer to not indexize the ones that are in s? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.