Received: from mail-pw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.160.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0rGF-0003yl-JO; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 01:11:52 -0700 Received: by pwi1 with SMTP id 1sf948443pwi.16 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 01:11:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject :message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :user-agent:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition; bh=fyeXkYSAK/BLCUZOaD4xTWa8I/mi4Vta7LcrU09XrmU=; b=O2xSAz6BBDXsAvJe12jhnBOODd5cakT7fs4062jpKtpUn6753VY986Dpvj146BN9hP TQ7CZXXavKxtQaNVbVb6DCcD7q/7H4yiPeLONZHvOMWP0Phfe1/UaR1lniMgvHaBQAuX 0aY1Zi5hLk9ReVSbXTcGA4ojvu5NH8TzddDl8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type:content-disposition; b=yjuBCAJa5JO5nlZi/0eb+sEPV+yyE7iI9GiXAPfMNvNyDYzTuXTLcQrb6T/fFDArsr zjDbjRSBlWlb4x8YnLB8ntx7OUkg9R15UnehLYFynJsnaJwAUSPzcIZXNF/0q52xhsym ajq0nIl1HctAvd749LJjiIagJESC2rk0n+2Eg= Received: by 10.142.51.16 with SMTP id y16mr94927wfy.12.1300522295738; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 01:11:35 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.142.178.21 with SMTP id a21ls1440339wff.0.p; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 01:11:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.209.17 with SMTP id h17mr365824wfg.17.1300522295042; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 01:11:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.209.17 with SMTP id h17mr365823wfg.17.1300522295022; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 01:11:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org (digitalkingdom.org [173.13.139.234]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 28si3237042wfb.6.2011.03.19.01.11.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 19 Mar 2011 01:11:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.234 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.234; Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0rG0-0003r7-7Z for bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 01:11:32 -0700 Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 01:11:32 -0700 From: Robin Lee Powell To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [bpfk] Should *every* use of every lojban word be cross-referenced? Message-ID: <20110319081132.GL17248@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com References: <643df517-e3f5-446c-a26e-16ba8478f87b@o14g2000yqe.googlegroups.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <643df517-e3f5-446c-a26e-16ba8478f87b@o14g2000yqe.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Original-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.234 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Length: 1829 On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 07:20:30PM -0800, Zort wrote: > The question came up when I asked Robin whether I could remove the > indexterm in: > > coi indexterm> FIXME: TAG SPOT > > > <anchor xml:id="c6e11d3"/> > > > coi. djan. > Hello, John. > > > > even though the corresponding Lojban word isn't wrapped in a > specifically (the TODO says to remove these types of > indexterms when there is such a wrapped Lojban word nearby). > > Me: Dunno, can't we just mark every single indextermed word, then > later if we feel like it tell the computer to not indexize the > ones that are in s? I've changed the way this is handled; only actually causes automatic indexterm links. Whether you choose to wrap something in , leave in an explicit indexterm, or drop both because that particular use of "coi" isn't important, is basically a style decision; I'm not terribly worried about it. -Robin -- http://singinst.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false" is "na nei". My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.