Received: from mail-fx0-f61.google.com ([209.85.161.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4KEl-0002ni-ST; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:44:39 -0700 Received: by fxm14 with SMTP id 14sf5587830fxm.16 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:44:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=RvGejQNiLgj+qpCR6cMXM7JI4dVxAeoHpakRkIy2CO0=; b=SpZdA2HQseMea/8ekDqB1vUYp1RSYC00tFo3La1E51E/yRj/AOwheWM/CTH7IU4ToM RJm0FJe7VKb1BCqKzee3NCg2ZIb+9eoRl09mjOSbKIb8vKS+eYRRPqrfp7sRNkC212lY eiN+GENIYkzxfygjyeAclSFOnEyuk8F3fOb7k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=ONUV639QNmFqcGjZwtCbKvS7YMklolYg4ucP1UPWD0lzvfp4L+ByCpAV/ZBfozGWR6 k71X8YiNGAlOdNhaM32iwMokyzWOUvplIZDagBDTeoyqiTEgt/dol5pUjpt0suTlTKHo Qc6lsXvYqTTLLlfXY2g/fWJm9+WsQ3tBsRwOs= Received: by 10.223.68.194 with SMTP id w2mr386624fai.24.1301348663541; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:44:23 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.35.21 with SMTP id n21ls1960677bkd.1.p; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:44:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.77.77 with SMTP id f13mr513852fak.28.1301348662671; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:44:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.77.77 with SMTP id f13mr513851fak.28.1301348662646; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:44:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-bw0-f52.google.com (mail-bw0-f52.google.com [209.85.214.52]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b4si361337fab.0.2011.03.28.14.44.21 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:44:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.52 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.52; Received: by bwj24 with SMTP id 24so2586863bwj.25 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:44:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.76.83 with SMTP id b19mr4074473bkk.126.1301348661215; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:44:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.104.5 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:44:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20110327235147.GM14415@digitalkingdom.org> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 15:44:21 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] Uniqueness across quantification. From: Jonathan Jones To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636499fbdae40cd049f91d801 Content-Length: 4742 --001636499fbdae40cd049f91d801 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Well, it's a good thing this is the BPFK. What say we call a vote to officialize "lo'au"? (And yes I know that officialize is not a word.) What other connectives have no gadri equivalent? 2011/3/28 Jorge Llamb=EDas > On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Jonathan Jones > wrote: > > What about fa'u? Could that be used for a simple bridi in this situatio= n > to > > indicate each of the three people lives in one unique house each? > > As a connective, yes: > > ko'a fa'u ko'e fa'u ko'i xabju fo'a fa'u fo'e fa'u fo'i > > means that ko'a lives in fo'a, ko'e lives in fo'e, and ko'i lives in fo'i= . > > Unfortunately, there is no gadri equivalent for fa'u (which is > somewhat strange because most other connectives do have their gadri > equivalent). If we had a fa'u-gadri, say "lo'au", then we could use it > for that: > > lo'au ci prenu cu xabju lo'au ci zdani > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "BPFK" group. > To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=3Den. > > --=20 mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu d= o zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googleg= roups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-l= ist?hl=3Den. --001636499fbdae40cd049f91d801 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Well, it's a good thing this is the BPFK. What say we call a vote to of= ficialize "lo'au"? (And yes I know that officialize is not a = word.)

What other connectives have no gadri equivalent?

2011/3/28 Jorge Llamb=EDas <jjllambias@gmail.com>
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
> What about fa'u? Could that be used for a simple bridi in this sit= uation to
> indicate each of the three people lives in one unique house each?

As a connective, yes:

=A0ko'a fa'u ko'e fa'u ko'i xabju fo'a fa'u fo&= #39;e fa'u fo'i

means that ko'a lives in fo'a, ko'e lives in fo'e, and ko&#= 39;i lives in fo'i.

Unfortunately, there is no gadri equivalent for fa'u (which is
somewhat strange because most other connectives do have their gadri
equivalent). If we had a fa'u-gadri, say "lo'au", then we= could use it
for that:

=A0 =A0lo'au ci prenu cu xabju lo'au ci zdani

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.<= br> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bp= fk-list?hl=3Den.




--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe lo pilno be = denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I= am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googleg= roups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-l= ist?hl=3Den.
--001636499fbdae40cd049f91d801--