Received: from mail-ww0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <bpfk-list+bncCJ2UzZHuDRCPs5PtBBoEbmvluw@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1Q9mZg-0004gy-Cp; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 16:01:38 -0700
Received: by wwb13 with SMTP id 13sf68959wwb.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 16:00:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version
         :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc
         :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post
         :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=nlZIs2LtdhNMAyaI6XC/aRp7DAyR166VlBYaaBr4FqM=;
        b=sYncvgR1b2Cy/dS6M0eULSlxjtWBN8QpaXLc5JUv9hvxJoDdTfkml0pGhtCtE3c6ct
         GdpanrS/MsvWA8GSfgQHaW+WZHWatIFDLsTcmEPjqZv9YSlp2/awsTsz/4YbhX8fxF0l
         t3NNptueAdmNhBKNanT9NVG5rMPbiabNHSS50=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        b=fYMmCaknqOLBTBHfy7DCnxkwEI0uRm8M+UCfDKYIHHBL5FmD6vcjQ2VIJlM/GmylRU
         itjiTFYMeF8Z3HfM4RbzN14B+O80rHMsGCXBryltEEkgeBNMQ+dCD2n2d6jp/rcH5m5K
         WHPI6RUa0s2gyPl1weSL6A9zU8vxuQlZhddyY=
Received: by 10.216.5.209 with SMTP id 59mr1663161wel.9.1302649231938;
        Tue, 12 Apr 2011 16:00:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.216.49.69 with SMTP id w47ls1314866web.2.p; Tue, 12 Apr 2011
 16:00:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.60.18 with SMTP id t18mr301122wec.5.1302649231153;
        Tue, 12 Apr 2011 16:00:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.60.18 with SMTP id t18mr301121wec.5.1302649231132;
        Tue, 12 Apr 2011 16:00:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wy0-f178.google.com (mail-wy0-f178.google.com [74.125.82.178])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p5si927988weq.15.2011.04.12.16.00.31
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Tue, 12 Apr 2011 16:00:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.178 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.178;
Received: by wyb33 with SMTP id 33so55768wyb.23
        for <bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 16:00:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.163.13 with SMTP id y13mr5126662wbx.56.1302649230994; Tue,
 12 Apr 2011 16:00:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.205.70 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 16:00:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20110412042241.GP21357@digitalkingdom.org>
References: <20110327235147.GM14415@digitalkingdom.org>
	<AANLkTinOs-MVhSif-2zufXT6S_w0=0qyqNrzmu8zcieQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110412042241.GP21357@digitalkingdom.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 20:00:30 -0300
Message-ID: <BANLkTikac9kHrBi6rCX7oY8uzp__fewDeg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bpfk] Uniqueness across quantification.
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Cc: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.178 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <bpfk-list.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en_US>
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe?hl=en_US>,
 <mailto:bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Length: 1249

On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Robin Lee Powell
<rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 09:03:05AM -0300, Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote:
>
>> If what you want to say is that three humans share one house, you
>> could say:
>>
>> =A0 lo ci remna cu kansi'u lo ka xabju lo (pa) zdani
>>
>> If you want to say that they each live in a different house, I
>> would suggest:
>>
>> =A0 ro lo ci remna cu xabju lo frica zdani
>>
>> which is not logically rigorous, but it's clear enough. If you do
>> need logical rigour, I don't see any way other than multiple
>> sentences.
>
> What would those multiple sentences be?

I was referring to something like what you had:

>>> 2.  Is there a decent, short way to handle this rigorously?  {ro le
>>> ci zdani cu se xabju pa le ci remna .i je re le ci remna cu xabju pa
>>> le ci zdani} is the best I've found, and it's pretty shitty.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googleg=
roups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-l=
ist?hl=3Den.